Yes. You conveniently left out Obama's re-election. And you tell ME to get a forebrain!
Again, HAND. That means I don't care enough to send the very best.
Yet you RESPOND. Admittedly with nothing but stupidity and condescension, but it is the best an Obama-Enabiling Freeper could do. I don't think you know what HAND is.
Begad! The Palin Offense!
You initiated this contact, and started with insult at that. People address me, I respond. Nevertheless, I hereby give you the last word, under the policy of noblesse oblige. I shall mercifully ignore you hereafter.
What few advantages Romney would bring are outweighed in big measure by the harm and damage he would do long term to the true limited government conservatism that is America's only path to success and freedom. Romney has a long track record of betraying limited government conservative principles; with him representing what being a Republican means, Americans seeking an antidote to big government Democrat party politics will reject the Republican party and scatter their votes to the wind on sundry "third" parties.
YOU are the enabler of damage and harm, Once-Ler. Not 668, not me, not any of us who reject Romney because we understand that the long-term sabotage he would wreak on the GOP would have at least as bad, and probably worse, consequences than an Obama presidency, especially one hindered by a GOP majority in Congress.
You are extremely short-sighted, Once-Ler, and that's only human. But you are also extremely hostile and intellectually deceitful when you conclude that anyone who refuses to vote for Romney is therefore an Obama "enabler."
I'll tell you what "enabled" Obama -- decades of Republicans, and I did my share of it, voting ever and ever further left, left, left, for moderates big-government Republicans out of fear that the Democrat would be worse. It pushed the "center" so far left that it made Obama possible.
Voting FOR the likes of Mitt is what enabled Obama, buddy. Some of us have woken up. It's time you did, too.