Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Slings and Arrows
I agree that this does not have 1st Amendment protection. It is libel.

Also, does this not come under "right to privacy"? Doesn't posting photos of living persons - unless of public figures - require permission of the subject?

The teens should face child porn charges.

18 posted on 01/14/2011 11:46:21 AM PST by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Dante3
Doesn't posting photos of living persons - unless of public figures - require permission of the subject?

Could you please expand on this statement? There are millions of websites that post pictures of individuals without their knowledge....take Flickr as an example.

53 posted on 01/14/2011 12:23:58 PM PST by Getsmart64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson