Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OldDeckHand
Apparently. If you wish to criminalize "mean speech" because the meanness of the of the speech might make someone do something untoward - either to themselves or to others, then yes, we could not disagree more

Apparently you think the protections against libel and slander that the founders considered necessary for civil society are outmoded.

I disagree with your personal assertion that the founders were idiots and that they did not know what they were doing. They did know, and they were far brighter than you are.

17 posted on 01/14/2011 11:45:41 AM PST by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: MrEdd
"Apparently you think the protections against libel and slander that the founders considered necessary for civil society are outmoded."

Yes, we have protections against libel and slander. Those protections are found in CIVIL law, not criminal law.

"I disagree with your personal assertion that the founders were idiots and that they did not know what they were doing. "

I have no idea how you came up with that little nugget. Where do I assert the founders were idiots?

22 posted on 01/14/2011 11:50:41 AM PST by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson