Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rottndog

The standard line from the pet owner is it got out, bet on the fact it got out everyday and that is why the cops was called.


18 posted on 01/12/2011 10:41:04 AM PST by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: org.whodat

Anyone, and I do mean anyone, who harms one of my family’s pets is a dead person walking. The only question is when, where, and how.


20 posted on 01/12/2011 10:45:18 AM PST by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: org.whodat

and thats a reason to taze then shoot it? it was growling at the very people that just attacked it. The dog was cornered and doing nothing more than tryin to protect itself. Gimme a break!


21 posted on 01/12/2011 10:45:33 AM PST by eak3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: org.whodat

Your “fact” is an assumption. Most dogs do not get out everyday. The cops were called because someone saw a loose dog and didn’t have the sense to call animal control.


22 posted on 01/12/2011 10:46:31 AM PST by Immerito (Reading Through the Bible in 90 Days)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: org.whodat

You are making a lot of assumptions with your comments.

IF, and that’s a big IF, what you’re assuming is true, then why did the neighborhood hold a vigil for the dog and its owners?

If the dog were a nuisance as you assume, then the neighbors should be applauding the cops, right?

Criticizing the owners for permitting their dog to roam and be a nuisance, right?

There’s only one problem. The opposite is what’s happening.

There were witnesses stating that the dog was being chased by children in the neighborhood and the dog didn’t display any aggressiveness towards the children.

The only time the dog apparently [cops versions here] did was after it was tased and chased into hiding by the police. There were many witness statements that contradict the police version of events.

Is discharging a firearm in a residential area and subsequently killing a dog really a prudent thing to do when the dog has hidden itself from its attackers?

Really? Was that the only option? I seriously doubt it.


35 posted on 01/12/2011 10:59:02 AM PST by SZonian (July 27, 2010. Life begins anew.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: org.whodat
I live in a rural area and our neighbors allow dogs to run loose much of the time but not all. Some have called the Sheriff and they will come out and ticket the owners after giving a warning. The Sheriff's deputies have never fired their guns although the area ranchers do. I could understand this in a rural area where no owners are around and the dog is psoing a threat. Not in this case. They should be fired. Too many people out of work these days for yahoo's to be given a free pass.
124 posted on 01/12/2011 3:20:54 PM PST by e_castillo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: org.whodat

What Lurker said!

Anyone, cops included, who shoots my dog
had better be paid up on his life insurance.


159 posted on 01/13/2011 8:48:06 AM PST by Emperor Palpatine (I'm shocked! Shocked to find out that gambling is going on in here!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson