I agree with most of what you’ve said. However, I think the explanation is a simple one. She just didn’t realize how potentially incendiary “Blood Libel” was. To use your analogy about throwing red meat, I don’t think she has any idea what she’s throwing, she’s just tossing it out there.
You are probably right, but as a potential presidential candidate, she MUST know these things in advance. It's why candidates assemble teams of advisers and a campaign staff, so research can be done and statements can be thoughtfully prepared. I won't excuse her poor timing and lack of public relations savvy for any reason.
Step back and look around.
That is your take on it, backed up by all the leftists and a few people working against what Free Republic is all about on this thread.
Your little cabal is detrioating before your very replies.
Yes, it burns you up (incendiary) that Pain is more relavant than the leftists.
Live with it.
Hey you have the 'freedom' to believe whatever you want, however there is NOTHING incendiary in Sarah calling what was what is.... The lying libelous liberals just never ever expected that anyone especially Sarah would call them just exactly what they are.
So you get 'falsely' accused of being the 'cause' for the death of an innocent 9 year old amongst several others and you will take that evil accusation as oh hum I must check in to see what response I can give that is 'politically correct'....
Funny, I don't see you posting how incindiary attempting to link the Tea Party and conseravtism to the Tucson shootings is. It's quite telling what you are taking issue with here.
And it so happens that the National Review and the Wall Street Journal are also using the term blood libel in this matter. Wanna call them stupid as well, you anal Rudybot?
Perhaps she just doesn't accept the Victim Card. Not all retailers do.