Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: antceecee

Don’t let any libs and their collaborators here, redefine the term “blood libel” for the sole purpose of bashing Palin. They don’t own the words and their attempt to redefine the term demonstrates their own ignorance, not hers.

This is willful ignorance so liberal commentators, and their collaborators here, can feel good about themselves. Notice, they can’t claim not to have made the false accusation that the Tea Party and Sarah Palin caused the Arizona shooting. So instead of defending it, which they can’t, they’ll just quibble about the words Palin used.


426 posted on 01/12/2011 10:48:56 AM PST by roses of sharon (I can do all things through Him who strengthens me. Philippians 4:13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 411 | View Replies ]


To: roses of sharon
Don’t let any libs and their collaborators here, redefine the term “blood libel” for the sole purpose of bashing Palin.

Their goal is not to redefine the term. Their goal is to hijack the thread, and they are succeeding. The best course of action is to ignore them. We all know they would criticize Palin no matter what she says. If not "blood libel", then something else. Arguing with them is pointless, and prevents any meaningful discussion from happening, which is exactly what they want.

481 posted on 01/12/2011 11:58:48 AM PST by Jess79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 426 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson