Would you like me to continue?
http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2010/01/proving-animus.html
From This article:
Since this plays on the oldest blood libel against gays, it certainly implies that the Proposition was motivated by prejudice. Imagine a Proposition that argued that Jews should be denied, say, being school-teachers because of the threat to the kids. No one would dispute that that’s a vile, “blood libel” motive for a constitutional amendment. But when exactly the same bigotry fuels a Proposition to deny gays the core right to marry, a right deeper in the constitution than the right to vote, it’s all apparently motivated by high-minded concern for family life.
.................
How bout this one from Slate in 2007?
You can’t teach an old lapdog new tricks. And Tony Blair was barking up the wrong tree yet again last week in his first major appearance since he skulked ingloriously away from office back in June. Blair seized the opportunity of a New York speech to trumpet the “blood libel” that Iran is now the embodiment of the entire “global ideology” of Islamic extremism, explicitly conflating the Tehran regime not only with al-Qaida but also with Nazi Germany
http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2007/10/24/selling_war