To: Scanian
To be clear, if you're using this event to criticize the "rhetoric" of Mrs. Palin or others with whom you disagree, then you're either: (a) asserting a connection between the "rhetoric" and the shooting, which based on evidence to date would be what we call a vicious lie; or (b) you're not, in which case you're just seizing on a tragedy to try to score unrelated political points, which is contemptible. Which is it?
To: Servant of the Cross
To be clear, if you're using this event to criticize the "rhetoric" of Mrs. Palin or others with whom you disagree, then you're either: (a) asserting a connection between the "rhetoric" and the shooting, which based on evidence to date would be what we call a vicious lie; or (b) you're not, in which case you're just seizing on a tragedy to try to score unrelated political points, which is contemptible. Which is it?Which is it? Huh? Answer the damn question MSM! Which is it? Keep it up and you're be totally irrelevant by 2012. We're fighting back on a daily basis. Bring it on. . .
27 posted on
01/10/2011 8:15:15 AM PST by
Art in Idaho
(Conservatism is the only hope for Western Civilization.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson