[WestCoastGal]

"Hal G. Brown, deputy director of the medical examiner’s office, said he did not know what medications or chemicals, if any, were in Wheeler’s system, but said the death certificate makes it clear that toxicology “didn’t play a role’’ in Wheeler’s death."

If that's true, toxicology testing indicates no drugs, no over/under medication to be included in cause of death. However, that he doesn't know what meds or chems, if any were in his system is either irresponsible or a cover up because one sentence is the opposite of the other. IMO

If this is true then he had a head injury causing his condition on the 29th.

If he had a stoke one would think the ME was smart enough to know that by autopsy and it wouldn't be giving up a BIG secret to say that. BTW I doubt this scenario totally.

[Protect the Bill of Rights]

Great minds (and all that), although you write it much better than I. :-)

[hoosiermama]

There was a paragraph in the ABC local news article that explained that the autopsy would only contain the direct cause of death. That although they knew of other factors in the body they would not include them in the report unless they had a direct impact on the death of the victim.

Only LEO has this other information routinely. As it's like contents on stomach, size,shape and/or place of injury may actually be part of the evidence that leads them to the culprit.

If waiting helps them catch the perps and some bigger fish, I'll wait.

Just want the creeps to pay! ALL of them.