Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: All
I do concede that a simple across-the-board reduction in benefits in SS, along with an increase in the retirement age and the elimination of non-retirees would accomplish the same reduction in expenditures.

Means testing should occur after the above.

263 posted on 01/02/2011 2:42:36 PM PST by Mariner (USS Tarawa, VQ3, USS Benjamin Stoddert, NAVCAMS WestPac, 7th Fleet, Navcommsta Puget Sound)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies ]


To: Mariner
I do concede that a simple across-the-board reduction in benefits in SS, along with an increase in the retirement age and the elimination of non-retirees would accomplish the same reduction in expenditures.

Agreed.

Means testing should occur after the above.

Disagreed.

272 posted on 01/02/2011 2:49:36 PM PST by meyer (Obama - the Schwartz is with him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies ]

To: Mariner

“I do concede that a simple across-the-board reduction in benefits in SS, along with an increase in the retirement age and the elimination of non-retirees would accomplish the same reduction in expenditures.

Means testing should occur after the above.”

As I move through this thread, I now see that you are moving the goalposts.

I would be MUCH more in agreement with THIS concept than trying to play “rich vs. poor” with your approval of means testing.

Maybe as I continue down the thread you will have come full circle to actually being a conservative. Miracles do happen.


551 posted on 01/03/2011 8:12:54 AM PST by battletank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson