>I never suggested they were and you’ve beaten that straw horse completely to death.
And yet you keep making inane comments about “the right to the money paid in” when any dullard understands that no such money exists anymore and the expectations were a sucker bet.
>I’m still waiting for name of that welfare program they ended back in the 90s.
You are being deliberately obtuse. I explained the situation, and I don’t really happen to care if you liked the answer, because it was just the facts. If you don’t believe that reducing the welfare rolls was an accomplishment, you are simply not worth arguing with. Noone will never get a majority to advocate eliminating the safety net completely (though I admit, I’d advocate it). Doing what you can to reduce it in size and scope while increasing efficiency is about as good as you can do.
That explains it, you're confused - you believe I'm someone else.
Although I agree with the basic sentiment, its not my point.
All I've said is lets start making the TAKERS go without first.