"AKA Obama Ineligible if he was born on the steps of the Capital in D.C."
Instead of adults treating his eligibility as a serious Constitutional issue, we act more like children negotiating bed time on a school night. It's not a complicated, hard question, but the answer is difficult for some to accept.
If one is able to put their political affiliation aside and look dispassionately at the facts as we know them, it's obvious that obama does not meet the Constitutional requirements for the office.
If one is able to put their political affiliation aside and look dispassionately at the facts as we know them, it’s obvious that obama does not meet the Constitutional requirements for the office.
Simply being ineligible to hold office and being removed may be the least of Obama’s problems. He may have committed treason.
If you have not watched the interview of Stephen Pidgeon (he and Leo Donofrio are representing the Chrysler dealers who were disenfranchised by Obama), take some time to do so because it deals with the issue of treason and high crimes alledgedly committed by Obama himself, the Daily Kos, Howard Dean and Nancy Pelosi, and even Chris Matthews and Bill O’Reilly and other people in the media covering for Obama.
The interview really begins around the 11:00 mark of the first part (but you may want to watch the beginning because they discuss the Pergamos Alter and how it relates to tyrants).
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/12/interview-with-attorney-stephen-pidgeon.html
So the birthers may be the least of Obama’s and his cohorts worries, because high crimes alledgedly have been committed to get him into office and are punishable by law.