Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EternalVigilance

She was also for cap and trade before she was against it.


115 posted on 12/30/2010 8:03:56 PM PST by Padams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]


To: Padams
She was also for cap and trade before she was against it.

No, she was/is not. This is what happens when people like you parrot the misconceptions, misrepresentations, and lies of others.
The facts are out there, if you're not too lazy to seek them out.

119 posted on 12/30/2010 8:09:49 PM PST by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]

To: Padams
She was also for cap and trade before she was against it.

Wrong. Go peddle your crap somewhere else.

172 posted on 12/30/2010 9:17:24 PM PST by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]

To: Padams

She supports capping carbon emissions, not cap and trade. She is not for unreasonable demands where technology has yet to be invented, and she doesn’t believe that humans affect the weather.


183 posted on 12/30/2010 9:34:51 PM PST by skr (May God confound the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson