Posted on 12/30/2010 9:39:59 AM PST by rabscuttle385
What does he want? Revenge. For what? Being born.
This is the way famous gunslinger Doc Holliday answers equally famous lawman and good friend Wyatt Earps inquiry - in their depiction in the movie Tombstone - into why their sworn enemy, Johnny Ringo, is such a misanthrope.
Sadly, this description would be equally accurate in explaining the actions of another Arizona transplant filled with endless rage: Senator John McCain.
I first encountered the seething side of McCain when I was writing my 2008 book, The Real McCain, which was critical of him while pointing out a then-controversial fact, one no longer in dispute among those who lionised him back then. Namely, that the Led Zeppelin-groupie relationship he then enjoyed with many in the media was based on a faulty premise.
John McCain was not a maverick (which he has since admitted after long identifying with the title), but a man driven by a need to fight. To fight for his own redemption, to fight with those who dared disagree with him, and most particularly, to fight with anyone who had delivered him a perceived humiliation of any sort. Think Yosemite Sam on a bender, or Vladamir Putin in those half-naked martial arts pictures.
Sure, McCain was also motivated by the very same political expediency which drives too many politicos, as well as coveting an appearance on the Sunday morning talk circuit the way a twenty-something blonde does meeting Edward Pattinson, or marrying Hugh Hefner.
But the driving force for McCain has been pure vitriol and spite. When I first pointed out this inconvenient truth in my book, that many Republicans, including some willing to go on the record, were sure McCain was motivated by demons and not decency, I was criticised or dismissed in many quarters. Yet, it was obvious to me back then that his battles with fellow Republicans and Democrats had become personal, crusades for the eternally perturbed Abe Simpson stand-in.
I broke two stories in my book that spoke to McCains temperament, that he had physically assaulted a member of his own party after taunting him (Republican Representative Rick Renzi) and had called his wife a very not-safe-for-work term of non-endearment. In perhaps an emblematic McCain moment, during a policy meeting with a fellow Republican, McCain called the guy a shhead. The senator demanded an apology. McCain stood up and said, I apologise, but youre still a shhead.
Theres a reason the dude was nicknamed McNasty in high school.
So when others still saw McCains breaking from President Bush on taxes, healthcare, the environment and gun control in the early 2000s as a sign of independence, I tried to point out what I had learned: He was just doing it because he hated Bush for beating him in the primaries. And when others saw his loss to then-Senator Barack Obama and thought hed work with Obama to display his maverickyness once Obama was sworn in, I warned that in all likelihood wed see McCain once again do his best Judge Elihu Smails impression.
But even I couldnt have expected how truly ridiculous hes become. As Deputy Political Director Michael McMurray of NBC News pointed out in a tweet just before Christmas that outside of Afghanistan, the AZ senator didn't support any major Obama WH policy in '09-'10. In fact, it has been much worse than that.
Bushs tax cuts for top earners, immigration reform, a nuclear arms treaty and even a military suicide prevention bill were not worthy of McCains support during the last two weeks. Not supporting a bill to prevent military suicides? Really? Its almost like this particular Scrooge got a visit from the Ghost of Christmas Crazy while napping after an especially large portion of Quaker Oats.
As journalist David Corn recently pointed out, looking at McCains increasingly desperate attacks against repealing the Dont Ask Dont Tell policy of allowing gays to serve in the military only if they were as vocal as a Buddhist Monk about who they really were, McCain practically threw a tantrum on the Senate floor, decrying this bizarro world and denouncing senators in favour of repeal Looking as if steam would shoot out of his ears at any moment, McCain went on to exclaim that ending DADT would endanger the survival of our young men and women in the military."
Of course, as Corn also wrote, Not only had McCain flip-flopped, he had become an angry crusader, seemingly full of rage at a policy initiative he once quasi-endorsed It seemed more personal than policy -- as in he really doesn't fancy seeing a victory for President Obama, the fellow who prevented McCain from becoming BMOC.
That is really the gist of it, and its at the heart of who McCain has been his entire time in Washington, whether most journalists have been willing to see it or not. Hes not a statesman, nor has he ever been. Hes a petulant bomb thrower. Hes Simon Cowell in a suit.
In fact, in a slightly alternative universe, it wouldnt really be all that hard to imagine McCain standing on a Times Square street corner screaming at passersby that they all deserve to go to hell, or challenging random strangers to a fight to the death using sticks to determine who gets his clay marble collection.
But in this one, he was just elected to another 6-year Senate term. And that tells you a helluva lot about the predicament in which we currently find ourselves as a nation.
I see less and less difference between jihadis and the left. Both are irrational, self-loathing angry hate-filled useless blobs of decaying protoplasm.
Other than that, they’re really nice people.
So, what makes Linda Grahamnesty the The Huckster JUANnabies?
the —> and the.
|
McCain is a piece of garbage. I am amazed the idiots in AZ voted him in. I guess they like their pork and illegals killing Arizonians. Kyl is no better.
If you read the article, from al jazeera no less, you’ll see as much as we may despise McCain, I’m glad the article sees him behaving as an enemy of Obama.
I admire fighters. People who stand up to thugs and adversity and meet challenges head-on. But what’s admirable about a rabid dog who snaps at anything that moves?
McCain has never impressed me as principled as much as driven - driven by demons apparently.
McCain is OUR problem..... WHY are we posting anything from Al Jeezera
An enemy of convenience, perhaps.
I think everyone realizes now that McCain, like Judas, Benedict Arnold, and the other assorted treasonous bastards that litter the history books, stands for no one except himself and for his own personal pleasure and enrichment.
“McCain is OUR problem..... WHY are we posting anything from Al Jeezera”
Agreed. rab displays these very problems himself. This is a new low, using an al jizera screed.
McCain is a problem. But I’ll pick him in a fight with al jizera any day.
Oh really, newbie?
Hey, how 'bout that.
Worth a zot?
McCain seems to despise everyone except McCain. Never once has he responded to letters while Kyl always responds nicely and even Giffords responds. McCain is totally absorbed with McCain.
but why give creedence to anything published by the ENEMY.
Exactly what is invalid about the article?
Perhaps you should re-read the hundreds of links pertaining to McCain and his temper tantrums over the years.
from the left...
Even blind, retarded squirrels find nuts on occasion.
Worth a zot?
If the Mods don't like the thread, then they may pull it. If they don't like the source, then they should probably add it to the list of automatically prohibited sources in FR's posting software.
But I'm all too happy if McCain's fury at Obama for beating him translates into his opposing whatever Obama does. Good. It may be for entirely the wrong reasons, but the outcome is beneficial.
As journalist David Corn recently pointed out, looking at McCains increasingly desperate attacks against repealing the Dont Ask Dont Tell policy of allowing gays to serve in the military only if they were as vocal as a Buddhist Monk about who they really were, McCain practically threw a tantrum on the Senate floor, decrying this bizarro world and denouncing senators in favour of repeal Looking as if steam would shoot out of his ears at any moment, McCain went on to exclaim that ending DADT would endanger the survival of our young men and women in the military."
Well, sorry, but the repeal of DADT, with a number of Republicans joining the gay party, was a disaster. For once, McCain had something he was entitled to be angry about.
What, he should have supported gays in the military to prove his good sense? I don't think so.
It’s not like we didn’t know McCain is crazy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.