The Supremes won’t touch this with a 10-foot pole: they recall all too well the grief they got over the 2000 election, and they feel as stated by Martinez, that the elections WERE the vetting process.
Looking forward, we need to change the laws so that these things are settled BEFORE the elections.
It would only take one major state making it law: my own Texas, for example.
Well Texas is run by RINOs like Perry, Kay Bailey and Cornyn so they will not do jack s**t.
Americans have drooling sheep controlled by Obama TV and Prince Al Waleed’s Fox News is just as bad. The morons traded liberty for a HD plasma idiot box.
I saw a letter that Democrats sent around to refute the birth certificate arguments. It was posted on FR a few months ago.
From scanning that letter it seemed to me that the one avenue to resolution is that Obama's next opponent must challenge his eligibility when Obama submits his paperwork certifying his eligibility. His opponent is the one with standing at that time.
I don't think any state has to create a law for this to happen. The law is already there.
If this is indeed the case, then Obama has to settle the BC issue now, or hope to manipulate the republicans to choose a candidate who won't challenge his eligibility.
McCain probably didn't challenge because there were questions of his own eligibility.
I think Sarah Palin would challenge. Maybe that's the reason for the 24/7 attacks against her.
JMO
In that case they really did not have the mandate to stop the recount. In this case, they are not only the last hope, they are the ONLY court which can define the term Natural Born Citizen.
At some point - with Barry in or out of office - they will have to define it.