There is nothing wrong with Vattel’s version. It is 100% correct and is what our founders followed. That book is why the NBC clause is present in our constitution to begin with.
Its only wrong if you support a POTUS who does not meet that requirement, and has usurped the office he obtained through fraud. Then its a real big problem.
There is nothing wrong with Vattel’s version. It is 100% correct and is what our founders followed. That book is why the NBC clause is present in our constitution to begin with.
Its only wrong if you support a POTUS who does not meet that requirement, and has usurped the office he obtained through fraud. Then its a real big problem.
88 posted on Wednesday, December 29, 2010 11:50:52 AM by Danae
Just curious, not contentious...
Has the Supreme Court ever cited Vattel in other cases?