To: Responsibility2nd
Exactly. He refused and interview with WND, so now he’s “staying mum” and “refusing interviews.”
One simple fact needs to be kept in mind when reading any WND story: The site exists to outrage. They do not attempt or aspire to a straightforward presentation of fact, and do not let facts get in the way of their goal. If you read a WND story and are not p-—ed off at the end, they have failed.
To: ReignOfError
Right on. WND writes yellow journalism.
138 posted on
12/29/2010 12:19:54 PM PST by
BuckeyeTexan
(There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind.)
To: ReignOfError; BuckeyeTexan
Exactly. He refused and interview with WND, so now hes staying mum and refusing interviews.
So what? If this is WND's tactic, then I'm glad. I'd like to send them a thank-you card. For the love of Pete, this is exactly the kind of tactic used against conservatives and any other red-blooded American by leftist news media (as in, all of them) for the last 40 years, and now you want to freak out because someone might be trying to play hardball with some old hippie idiot? Why? For the love of God, why?
Let them stir the pot, if they want, to the extent that they have any influence. The more who read it, the better, and I hope people ARE pissed off when they're finished.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson