According to our CONSTITUTION, she is correct. And that is what counts at this stage.
"So what?"
So my anti-abortion chops are as good as yours, if not better.
"It is Life that I defend, the principles of Reagan, and of the Christian Right. Palin will not suffice, The Christian Right will *not* compromise on Life.
Ah, yes...Reagan. The man who signed California abortion-rights into law, is just great. While Palin, who supported an Alaskan pro-life constitutional amendment, who actually, personally, chose life, is not. Stupidity lives!!
"Huck's rise, yet again, proves it."
What it proves is that there are still a bunch of fundamentalists who can be led around by the nose by the right "Elmer Gantry", in this case, the "Huckster", which name fits the man to a "T".
The whole idea that anybody who isn't wildly in favor of a pro-life Constitutional Amendment is therefore pro-abortion is so stupid as to beggar the imagination, and exists for one reason, and one reason only...to peel off as much of Palin's anti-abortion support as possible.
No, she is stone dead wrong according to our Constitution, and incredibly shallow-minded in her position.
Her point (and yours, it seems) is made when you can show me any state (or even the fed) which has the right to take YOUR life in abrogation of the Constitutionally appointed limits thereof (Due Process, Just Cause).
Show me that, and I will cede the point. Otherwise, what is good for you is good for the unborn child, and you are in grave error.
So my anti-abortion chops are as good as yours, if not better.
My "chops" or yours are not the question. It is the chops of the 60M strong Christian Right which are in question, and their position has been long declared.
Ah, yes...Reagan. The man who signed California abortion-rights into law, is just great.
Perhaps you should read the actual bill that Reagan did sign, and not rely on what the state of Cal did with it thereafter. His intention was very clear. Nice to see your neocon roots, though. Hacking on Reagan is the surest sign.
What it proves is that there are still a bunch of fundamentalists who can be led around by the nose by the right "Elmer Gantry", in this case, the "Huckster", which name fits the man to a "T".
Yeah. Enough of them to bring him right down to the wire, all by themselves. There is no doubt that the Pro-life movement was behind huck, and rightly so, as they had absolutely nowhere else to go. Palin won't change that, no matter how much you wish for it.
The whole idea that anybody who isn't wildly in favor of a pro-life Constitutional Amendment is therefore pro-abortion is so stupid as to beggar the imagination, and exists for one reason, and one reason only...to peel off as much of Palin's anti-abortion support as possible.
That isn't what I said.