Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Colvin
This seems to me to be a misstep. Taking on Michelle was a rotten idea.

Really?

Let's see. We have a empirical, American hating Socialist who had just been give $15 million of our tax dollars to dictate to us what we shall and shall not eat.

She says no more bake sales for schools (a centuries old tradition), No Happy Meals, rules and regs that hamper restaurants, ad museum - and says we shouldn't eat desserts - while we see her scarfing down ice cream, Slurpees, french fries,etc - not to mention her rather broad read end.

Then we have Sarah - in super shape - (maybe she should advise mookie to feed HER kids moose and elk meat) - and she shouldn't make any remarks on the dictorial edicts coming from a first lady - using billions of our tax dollars to direct our lives, right down to our dinner tables?

This added intrusion into our lives needs to be stopped before it goes further - and IT WILL. Wait until your overweight child doesn't come home from school - and you find out it's because the Dept of Human Health has taken them to protect them from YOU, the abusive parent who has allowed your child to be overweight.

Think Not?

Criticize Sarah who is pointing out the absurdity of this food-control agenda instead of the agenda and it's dictator - and you WILL see it.

The reason this country and our freedoms are in such danger is because people think it's unwise to speak out.

Good grief.

130 posted on 12/28/2010 4:39:02 PM PST by maine-iac7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: maine-iac7

She has no power, it would be like taking on Laura Bush.


159 posted on 12/29/2010 6:35:09 AM PST by Colvin (Proud Owner '66 Binder PU, '66 Binder Travelall,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson