Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: freedomwarrior998

Since now voter “intent” is paramount, doesn’t that give Joe a lot of votes when people wrote in his name even though his name is on the ballot as a listed candidate? I thought I heard that these ballots would not be counted. What a complete travesty of justice if true.


91 posted on 12/22/2010 7:38:47 PM PST by fwdude (Anita Bryant was right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: fwdude

Not true. In the decision, the Court noted that write-ins for Miller were counted using the same standards as for Murky. Miller gained 20 votes. And the standards were the SAME as required in Federal law for counting the votes of military personnel submitting absentee ballots. [Citation in the decision.]

Another important part of the decision is that whatever Miller may object to, the burden is on him to show that it would change the election outcome. From the detailed counting tabulations that both sides agreed were accurate, the Court found that no matter if all of Miller’s challenges were accepted, he still would lose.

Contorted legal arguments and faulty reasoning yield to the actual numbers of votes.


96 posted on 12/22/2010 7:52:16 PM PST by saltus (God's Will be done)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson