I completely support the banks using whatever force is necessary to recoup their properties; they should be aware of the legal ramifications of taking their time about it.
If you own a home, and pay your taxes, who says you have to be actually living in it all the time? Why should there be "legal ramifications" to not occupying your property for a period of time?
You are making good points. The banks know the ramifications. Adverse possession is one of the hardest things to win in court. Modern day times, courts might consider the case of a family using a driveway for 15 yrs and finding out they didn’t own it. Squatters don’t have a chance so far in my opinion. Of course that may change if the current administration doesn’t go away. BTW, your comment about a very learned person caused a good laugh. You don’t sound like a socialist to me.