Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dajeeps
What if the PAC manager(s) were to form an alliance with another one? It likely wouldn’t be a big fish in the pond alone, but there is strength in numbers while still having control over some of the funds.

Money talks. Suckas walk. FRPAC will have say proportionate to $$$$. Like I said, Coming up with a paltry $100k will hurt us more than help as it will say, "See, you needed worry about caving, the conservatives have no clout."

Coalitions is what gets you the GOP as it is now. Coalitions require compromise. Compromise for a conservative means sacrificing principles. Pretty soon, you're singing Lindsay Graham's tune.

Again, what's the objective here?

Advancing conservative ideals, or getting a hand in the corrupted process as it exists?

163 posted on 12/20/2010 9:53:36 AM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies ]


To: sam_paine

“Coalitions is what gets you the GOP as it is now. Coalitions require compromise. Compromise for a conservative means sacrificing principles. Pretty soon, you’re singing Lindsay Graham’s tune.”

It likely depends on which organizations are partnered with as to whether or not that would happen or just how much compromise would be needed. It seems doubtful to me that FR PAC would play with RINOs and there are other conservative PACs out there that are doing things it might be interested in joining.

Of course that’s just an idea I’m throwing out there for getting started. That will be the hardest part until FR PAC can find some donors with deep pockets, otherwise it’s tough to get things done without much money.


214 posted on 12/20/2010 3:16:03 PM PST by dajeeps
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson