Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Note: Thus far humblegunner has been compiling the ping list. I am doing research and plan to write a summary for group consideration. Neither humblegunner nor myself are attempting to manage this effort. All ideas are welcome.

To move forward, we have to make some decisions. That's the purpose of this thread.

1 posted on 12/19/2010 7:55:46 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last
To: BuckeyeTexan; humblegunner; onyx; Jim Robinson

humblegunner reviewed the prior thread for respondents and sent a Freepmail. Thank you very much humblegunner for doing that.

FWIW,
I responded using Freepmail describing my professional and political experience and limits of those so that my efforts can be as well utilized as possible.
WooHoo! Lets Roll!


31 posted on 12/19/2010 8:56:17 PM PST by RedMDer (Forward with Confidence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan
BTTT
32 posted on 12/19/2010 8:56:49 PM PST by vox_freedom (America is being tested as never before in its history. May God help us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

I’m in. Please add me to the ping list.

I’m sick of RINOS. If they don’t get their way they just stab conservatives in the back. See Lisa Murkowski, Mike Castle, etc.

OK, that’s good news. The bad news is that I won’t be able to contribute much money but I will give what I can.


38 posted on 12/19/2010 9:04:54 PM PST by Ticonderoga34 (Free Obama's Birth Certificate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan
From the other thread.


"SSFs and Nonconnected PACs"

http://www.fec.gov/pages/brochures/ssfvnonconnected.shtml


- - - -

"Published in May 2008


Note: Portions of this publication may be affected by the Supreme Court's decision in Citizens United v. FEC. Essentially, the Court's ruling permits corporations and labor organizations to use treasury funds to make independent expenditures in connection with federal elections and to fund electioneering communications. The ruling did not affect the ban on corporate or union contributions or the reporting requirements for independent expenditures and electioneering communications. The Commission is studying the Court's opinion and will provide additional guidance as soon as possible.

 

The press and public refer to all nonparty, noncandidate committees as PACs or political action committees. However, the Act and Commission Regulations distinguish between two types of PACs: separate segregated funds and nonconnected political committees (or nonconnected PACs). The article below discusses some of the major differences between these two types of political committees.

 
What is the principal difference between separate segregated funds and other PACs?

The Act prohibits corporations (profit or nonprofit), labor organizations and incorporated membership organizations from making direct contributions or expenditures in connection with federal elections. 2 U.S.C. §44lb. These organizations may, however, sponsor a separate segregated fund (SSF), popularly called a PAC, which collects contributions from a limited class of individuals and uses this money to make contributions and expenditures to influence federal elections. 11 CFR 100.6. As the sponsor of the SSF (i.e., its "connected organization"), the corporation, labor organization or incorporated membership organization may absorb all the costs of establishing and operating the SSF and soliciting contributions to it. These administrative expenses are fully exempted from the Act’s definitions of "contribution" and "expenditure." 11 CFR 114.1(a)(2)(iii).

By contrast, a nonconnected political committee, another type of PAC, is financially independent. This means that the nonconnected political committee must pay for its own administrative expenses, using the contributions it raises. Although an organization may spend funds to establish or support a nonconnected PAC, these expenditures are considered contributions to the PAC and are subject to the dollar limits and other requirements of the Act.

 
Do the reporting requirements vary for SSFs and nonconnected PACs?

Yes. An SSF is not required to report any fundraising or administrative expenses that are paid for by its sponsoring organization. (The SSF must, however, report these expenses if it pays for them.) On the other hand, a nonconnected PAC must report all its operating and solicitation expenses.

40 posted on 12/19/2010 9:06:52 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

One of the things to consider is whether the donations would be tax deductible. There is still time before 2010 closes out. It could be significant.


41 posted on 12/19/2010 9:07:14 PM PST by Kevmo (Turning the Party over to the so-called moderates wouldn't make any sense at all. ~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan
Some links.


Recommended reading here from the FEC:


toolkitNonconnected PAC Registration Toolkit

Essential:

 

Recommended:

TOP

 

From this page:

http://www.fec.gov/info/toolkit.shtml#nonconnected

43 posted on 12/19/2010 9:08:59 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan
I'm in. We would need a logo like this, modified somewhat. Image and video hosting by TinyPic
45 posted on 12/19/2010 9:12:11 PM PST by adm5 (AMERICA HAS ONLY GOD AND THE SECOND AMENDMENT LEFT TO SAVE THE REPUBLIC. by: LibLieSlayer 3/18/10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan
Some more...




Saturday, December 18, 2010 9:33:47 PM · 714 of 1,579
Red Steel to Jim Robinson; humblegunner; onyx; Syncro; BuckeyeTexan; GitmoSailor; kristinn; All

Great! We’ve got to get up to speed on the laws for organizing PACs at the federal level and separately in each and every state. Ain’t gonna be easy but it can be done! We should organize at the federal level immediately to target the RINO Senators due up in 2012!


To get started this is the place.

From the Federal Election Commission:

Quick Answers to PAC Questions and where to download the "PAC Registration Toolkit."

http://www.fec.gov/ans/answers_pac.shtml

And

Quick Answers to Common Questions

http://www.fec.gov/ans/answers.shtml

And

"How to Create a Political Action Committee"

http://www.ehow.com/how_2077352_create-political-action-committee.html

47 posted on 12/19/2010 9:12:39 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan; humblegunner

To whomever is managing this ping list, if I am not already on the list, please add me.

Thanks.


51 posted on 12/19/2010 9:21:20 PM PST by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan
I think that even though mainly the purpose will be to defeat RINO’s but also to elect Constitutional Conservatives re “True God and Country Conservatives™ “ (TG/CCs™) to
all offices that are up for election, many of which will not be involving RINO’s but Democrats and Independents.

I think the positive should be clearly and boldly emphasized.

52 posted on 12/19/2010 9:26:57 PM PST by Syncro (Sarah Palin, the unofficial Tea Party candidate for president--Virtual Jerusalem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Please ping me to this list.


53 posted on 12/19/2010 9:30:09 PM PST by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Put me on the ping list. I’ve been here since 1998 (not under this sn). My own crusade against Harry Reid showed me none of us can do it alone.


55 posted on 12/19/2010 9:30:50 PM PST by DaxtonBrown (HARRY: Money Mob & Influence (See my Expose on Reid on amazon.com written by me!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan; Jim Robinson; upchuck; calcowgirl; DoughtyOne; Avoiding_Sulla; BufordP; Liz; ...
We need to organize an anti-RINO PAC...

I nominate McLame's BFF Lindsey Graham to be the FReeper PAC's first target.

To hell with the RINO trash!

57 posted on 12/19/2010 9:33:58 PM PST by rabscuttle385 (Live Free or Die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Please add me to the ping list.


58 posted on 12/19/2010 9:36:17 PM PST by Waryone (RINOs, Elites, and Socialists - on the endangered list, soon to become extinct.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Thanks for the ping. (I’ve been trying to catch up on the other thread - I’m at 1370, LOL.)

I think we need to state guidelines about what the PAC considers conservative and what is considered RINO (or CINO).

That could get contentious (ya think, lol), but we need to clearly hammer it out so the politicians will know exactly what we expect from them and what won’t be tolerated.

Clear statements about:

God, Christianity, and morality and against abortion and the homosexual agenda

Definition of life and the defense of life in the womb, in old age, in comas

Country, the Constitution, small government, States rights, the Bill of Rights and correct interpretation and enforcement

Respect and support for families, individuals, property rights, and liberty

Economy, low taxes, real money instead of fiat money, control or eliminate the Fed, sound monetary policy, fiscal restraint, eliminate the deficit and deficit spending

Defense, support our troops, retain military superiority, ROEs that make sense and don’t handcuff our fighting forces

And more, but you get the idea. I know I joke around a lot, (after all, I do maintain the humor ping list), but I’m very serious about this. We need to boldly and unequivically state our position.

FReegards,
RT


61 posted on 12/19/2010 9:42:42 PM PST by RebelTex (FREEDOM IS EVERYONE'S RIGHT! AND EVERYONE'S RESPONSIBILITY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Ping me up for FR PAC! Will help in any way I can be of use, although I am generally just a big mouth with little organization experience. I have excellent research skills, however, and I am a big antebellum history buff.


67 posted on 12/19/2010 9:52:53 PM PST by dajeeps
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Please add me to your ping list.

Thx :)


70 posted on 12/19/2010 10:05:26 PM PST by getmeouttaPalmBeachCounty_FL (*********************End automatic pay raises for congresscritters**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Add me


74 posted on 12/19/2010 10:39:55 PM PST by montag813 (http://www.facebook.com/StandWithArizona)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Add me to ping list, please.


77 posted on 12/19/2010 10:56:34 PM PST by weeder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

...”We need to organize an anti-RINO PAC”...

How would the PAC define “RINO”?


78 posted on 12/19/2010 11:00:50 PM PST by Kimberly GG ("Path to Citizenship" Amnesty candidates will NOT get my vote! ~ DeMint, 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson