Posted on 12/19/2010 7:55:43 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan
Add me to the list. I have one here we need to get rid of.
Thanks
I agree. Graham has to go!
Would you please add me to the ping list also?
Please ping me too, I’ll help where I can.
Please add me as well. Thank you
Add me to the ping please!!!!!
Thanks for your pro-life inclusions in your list. I’m against abortion, too, but so many people forget that bring pro-life dosent stop there. Your inclusion of the elderly & people in comas was refreshing to see. Thank you.
I'll do whatever I can to get the RINOs out of Congress.
I'll keep reading this thread for more information.
Please add me to the list.
Add me to the list, too please. Thanks
Please add me to the ping list.
Add me to the ping list.
I’m mailing you a book I wrote on political psychology tomorrow, and this is discussed. If my fundamental theory on the origins of our political psychology is correct, for maximum effect, you need to gather funds from a broad fundraising base and then select only a few races to apply them to.
By taking all your funds, and giving them to, say for example’s sake, one Conservative in a Republican Primary, opposite an incumbant RINO, you force that one RINO to either lose the primary, or blow all his money fending off a very well financed primary challenger. Having blown his money, he is then at a gross disadvantage in the general, and likely to lose. Either way, you win, because it is his loss you need.
Now you have established that the single most RINO candidate, as you see it, will be a certain goner in each election cycle. As every RINO tries to make sure they are not that certain goner, they will all begin to pull back, each one trying to be less of a RINO than the next so as to avoid the axe, and all of them getting more Conservative. You will create a competition among them to not be the most moderate.
One can make a strategic argument for a broad based, poll driven attack on candidates everywhere, but if I am right about the psychology, then creating one certain political career death per cycle would have more of an effect than 50 or 60 possible career deaths.
Of course in reality, if your fundraising is big enough, you can do two or three, or maybe more, but you are better off consolidating your forces, to the point you are getting certain kills, to establish your political lethality, even if it looks as if it will take longer initially.
Everybody will think they can survive a maybe, if you average 50%. But even a single certain kill each cycle, taking away one, or two, or three “moderate”’s political jobs, will drive everyone back from that line, so as to be farther from it than the next guy. Remember, RINO’s have no principles, they are about themselves. Make them think the most moderate one will get it, and they will have a race against each other to get back away from that moderate line, and they will all become more Conservative.
I’m up, adding to the list.
BUMP...Thank You for the ping. I will be reading information, and waiting for the next ping.
Great Draft of Purpose.
A Pitchfork Action Committee would be the best news, but any advance of FR into new territory or methods is a very, very good thing!
Helllllllllllloooooo, we already are a PAC. In 2000, we got out and got the vote. We can do it again without anything more than our voices, the ability to read and write. Just ask Jim or Kristin or US Conservative or GRRRRR or Grendel or Bad Joe or Alamo Girl or Bob J or anyone of a dozen people who have been here since the begininning. We are Political Action!!!!!!!!!!!!
Oh yeah, please add me to the list.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.