i do not agree with the homosexual lifestyle nor do i agree with the repeal of dadt. i do not promote that lifestyle. i believe it is an abomination before God and i have taught my children to understand that no matter what they hear from others (liberal, progressive, politically correct idiots), this lifestyle is not “just another normal”. it is not normal on any level. i am not naive and i will no longer be discussing the issue since mr. robinson has threatened me with the zot for asking a question about the subject.
No, Jim threatened you because he perceived that you were a supporter of the gay agenda. (your post did make it look that way, since you made inaccurate generalities about their behavior)
"i am a strict fiscal conservative. i am a strict constructionist. i am probably a bit libertarian about social issues. i just don’t see what in the constitution gives the federal gov’t the right to make laws regarding marriage, education, enviroment, and other issues."
Tell me where in the constitution is the authorization for the federal government to FORCE homosexualism on our free society? Our schools? Our churches? Our businesses? Our public square? How is the government using ungranted police powers and FORCE considered strict constructionism? Which of our Founding Fathers insisted homosexualism as God-given, constitutionally guaranteed civil rights? Please refer to the founding documents, federalist papers or debates that substantiate your claims.
Yet madam, day after day, you post on this subject but always end it with I will be quiet now. Enough already.