Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Safrguns
I thought the implementation of DADT was pro-gay.

It was a step in that direction, but with gays it will never be enough. It's all about incrementalism with them. They won't stop here....it will never stop until homosexuality is deemed superior to heterosexuality.

17 posted on 12/19/2010 9:00:48 AM PST by dfwgator (Welcome to the Gator Nation Will Muschamp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: dfwgator

>>> It was a step in that direction

Then how is removing it considered another step in the same direction? That’s my question.

Unless the repeal specifically forbids the observance or enforcement of anti-sodomy law in the USMCJ, this repeal is a step backwards for gays... and I don’t get it.

Seems more to me like this whole DADT repeal is more about re-writing the Clinton legacy... making it look like his policy was more anti-gay than pro-gay by repealing it.

Either that, or it establishes a basis upon which Obama can effectively campaign against Clinton as anti-gay.

Either way, I still don’t understand how this repeal is pro-gay.


36 posted on 12/19/2010 9:21:54 AM PST by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: dfwgator

“They won’t stop here....it will never stop until homosexuality is deemed superior to heterosexuality.”

YES! You are right! Right now, all strip joints and titty bars in San Francico are CONFINED to a heterosexual RESERVATION called the Tenderloin District! EVERY WHERE else is is GAY!


38 posted on 12/19/2010 9:23:15 AM PST by 2harddrive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson