Worst part about it, I had to spell check the day lights out of this report HA ! There were many corrections needed.
To: TheRevolution1776
As long as there are dictatorships, the US should take no part in this.
Net neutrality will be an input into this.
2 posted on
12/19/2010 6:44:27 AM PST by
EQAndyBuzz
(Remember March 23, 1775. Remember March 23, 2010)
To: TheRevolution1776
More Globalism on the way.
4 posted on
12/19/2010 7:17:13 AM PST by
UCFRoadWarrior
(Whenever something is "Global"...it means its bad for America)
To: TheRevolution1776
5 posted on
12/19/2010 7:22:41 AM PST by
steveab
(When was the last time someone tried to sell you a CO2 induced climate control system for your home?)
To: TheRevolution1776
6 posted on
12/19/2010 1:17:00 PM PST by
phockthis
Why is the Australian UN rep to this meeting unidentified?
7 posted on
12/19/2010 7:41:23 PM PST by
piasa
To: Cindy
Note the use of the Soros’ Open Society Institute’s favorite phrase “civil society” by the folks involved in this meeting.
8 posted on
12/19/2010 7:43:07 PM PST by
piasa
DECEMBER 15, 2010 : (NY : "REPRESENTATIVES" FROM BRAZIL CALL FOR AN INTL BODY TO POLICE THE INTERNET ----see WIKILEAKS, CHINA, SOUTH AFRICA, SAUDI ARABIA, INDIA, CENSORSHIP) At a meeting in New York on Wednesday, representatives from Brazil called for an international body made up of Government representatives that would attempt to create global standards for policing the internet - specifically in reaction to challenges such as WikiLeaks.
The Brazilian delegate stressed, however, that this should not be seen as a call for a "takeover" of the internet. India, South Africa, China and Saudi Arabia appeared to favor a new possible over-arching inter-government body. ...----- UN mulls internet regulation options itNews for Australian Business ^ | Dec 17, 2010 9:51 AM | John Hilvert
9 posted on
12/19/2010 7:49:03 PM PST by
piasa
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson