[Paradox]

I _think_ I am still on board here on FR. But here is my quandary. Unlike several vocal freepers, I do not "hate" gays, nor do they disgust me that much. But really that depends on the details and I don't care to go into it. I don't think they are normal, and I think pretending that they are is silly at best, demented at worst. I have a few gay friends and acquaintances and they seem to otherwise be decent people.

I don't exactly know what the "homosexual agenda" is, however. I support basic human rights for ALL people, including the unmarried, etc. I don't consider the military to be normal "society", so I believe they should be allowed to have their own set of rules that can deviate a little from what normal society might have. I thought DADT was a pretty good compromise actually.

I don't seem to have in me, the anti-gay rancor that many freepers have, but I _think_ I am opposed to the "homosexual agenda", just not really sure what that is...

[central_va]

I don't seem to have in me, the anti-gay rancor that many freepers have, but I _think_ I am opposed to the "homosexual agenda", just not really sure what that is...

What compelled you to post that diatribe on a thread like this? What else are you confused about?

The Pink agenda has gone from tolerance to acceptance. This place, Free Republic, is one of the last bastions of sanity left in the world. Get a clue.

[StAnDeliver]

"I thought DADT was a pretty good compromise actually...I _think_ I am opposed to the "homosexual agenda", just not really sure what that is..."

Paradox, I have the perfect explanation for you. The Homosexual Agenda is Journolister, Bobo Worshipper, and laughably lame anti-FReeper David Corn immediately tweeting after the DADT vote:

DavidCornDC: "Make War, Not Marriage: It's now okay for a gay American to kill overseas, but not to love and marry at home."

It wasn't just good enough for the Homosexual Agenda to replace recruitment with recruitment; but of course it was all just a feint for the main course, which is universal homosexual marriage.

[dixiechick2000]

LOL! You are still on board here, and I’m happy to ‘see’ you. ;o)

“I don’t consider the military to be normal “society”, so I believe they should be allowed to have their own set of rules that can deviate a little from what normal society might have. I thought DADT was a pretty good compromise actually.”

You are exactly right on the military’s role in society...it should have none, except to defend this country. Without rules...cohesiveness...order...they are not as effective as they need to be. DADT was a great compromise, allowing gays to serve without effecting military cohesiveness.

I c/p that part of your post, however I agree with every word you wrote.