Posted on 12/18/2010 11:33:01 AM PST by Jim Robinson
But there still remain lots of folks with whom you disagree and would like to see zotted.
For reasons not so easily defined.
Meaning I’ve had words with him before, not that he got zotted ‘cause he didn’t loike me.
I don’t have the power of Zot.
It might help to get specific unless you wish do but the very thing you accuse the many of doing...
I grow weary of those who associate good things with homosexual sex or those who champion on one hand human dignity due all created in His image while on the other hand are all but silent when said humanity spits in God's face by promoting homosexual sex as normal and directly defiles God by defiling His image by engaging in homosexusl sex...
Mostly I can’t stand people pushing faggotry or other vicious immorality, which destroy the foundation of our country.
Pretty simple.
WOW
Imho, homosexuals are mentally ill.
They are not "gay".
I do not know "for a fact" "that gay people have served honorably and with distinction in the service of our country".
I believe that this repeal is wrong and may well mean the beginning of the end for our country as we and our forefathers have known it.
Well, I kind of agree with him LJ, and I pinged Jim to the thread to provide him with the opportunity to ban me if he find my views on homosexuality incompatible with FR.
I have no issues with lesbians and homosexuals. They can’t reasonably serve in the military in the same units as straight servicemen, so I oppose that. It simply creates a hostile environment for the straight soldiers, so it’s unworkable. However, they should be forced to serve in homosexual only units should there be a draft. I’m offended by the notion that only straight young men should be forced to offer their lives in a war of such a scope that it would require the draft be reinstated.
In the civilian world, I believe they should be able to live their lives unmolested. The freedom of association that we possess (and the military lacks) is all that’s needed to protect those who don’t want to be around them.
If gay behavior offends you, it grosses me out (close enough to offense), don’t watch. Don’t go where they go, and truth to tell, there aren’t many of them, so they’re easy enough to avoid. They have their own bars, clubs, etc, so you almost have to seek them out to be offended.
I’m against the homosexual agenda, and by that I’m referring to situations like the photographer in New Mexico who was successfully sued because he wouldn’t take pictures of a purely ceremonial and non-binding gay wedding. That’s wrong, and it must be stopped. There were photographers who would have willing shot the wedding, and the couple should have chose one of those.
However, if you being against the homosexual agenda goes beyond that, then no LJ, I’m not on your side. I don’t want to punish anyone for being gay or make life rough on them. I just want to insure that they can’t compel those who’d rather not, take part. I want them to be free as a jaybird to be as gay as they want to be, while I remain free to be as far removed from that world as I choose.
A very Merry Christmas to us all. :)
You can take this one out of the "fear" column and put it in the "fact" column.
I’ve seen a different side of FR today that somehow I missed before and I just cannot be a part of it. It is time for me to leave the forum.
***And yet, you’re still here as well. Maybe the zot generator is working on some kind of delay.
You consistently and conveniently ignore the jackbooted thuggism of the homsoexual agenda. Our rights of freedom of religion, speech and association are already - right now - curtailed due to the homosexual agenda, and it’s only getting worse.
You pretend for some reason not to see this. You aren’t dumb, so it’s not that you can’t read well. There have been many, many hundreds of articles about the infringements on our rights from the advancement of the homosexual agenda for years and years. Have you somehow managed to avoid reading any of those aritcles? That’s hard to believe.
Question: Is “faggotry” a word?
Answer: If it ain’t, it oughta be.
Well, that’s the entire point of this exercise. If you push the homosexual agenda (which I feel is a repugnant Marxist attack on our God-given constitutional rights) on FR, your account here will get the zot.
Pretty simple. Either you is or you ain’t, baby.
Crikey, you found better stuff than I did.
What is a political action committee?
The term “political action committee” (PAC) refers to two distinct types of political committees registered with the FEC: separate segregated funds (SSFs) and nonconnected committees. Basically, SSFs are political committees established and administered by corporations, labor unions, membership organizations or trade associations. These committees can only solicit contributions from individuals associated with connected or sponsoring organization. By contrast, nonconnected committees—as their name suggests—are not sponsored by or connected to any of the aforementioned entities and are free to solicit contributions from the general public. For additional information, consult our Separate Segregated Funds and Nonconnected Committees fact sheet.
Are the titles chosen for SSFs and nonconnected PACs subject to different requirements?
Yes. The Act and Commission Regulations require an SSF to include the name of its sponsoring organization in its official title. 2 U.S.C. §432(e)(5); 11 CFR 102.14(c). The Act places no such restriction on the title that an nonconnected PAC uses. Neither committee, however, may include the name of a candidate in its title.
May both an SSF and an nonconnected PAC contribute up to $5,000 to each of a candidate’s election campaigns?
Yes. Provided the SSF or the nonconnected PAC has qualified as a multicandidate committee by having:
1. been registered with the Commission at least six months,
2. received contributions from over 50 persons, and
3. made contributions to at least five candidates for federal office.
2 U.S.C. §441a(a)(5).
What other requirements of the Act and FEC Regulations apply to both SSFs and nonconnected PACs?
Most of the basic requirements of the Act and Regulations are the same for SSFs and nonconnected political committees. For example, the prohibitions and limits on contributions apply equally to both SSFs and nonconnected PACs. In addition, both types of committees must fulfill the same basic recordkeeping and reporting requirements, although an SSF does not have to report operating expenses paid for by its sponsoring organization (see above). Finally, SSFs and nonconnected PACs may support candidates in the same ways, that is, by making monetary and in-kind contributions to candidates, by contributing to their political parties and by making independent expenditures to support or oppose candidates.
How do I start a nonconnected PAC?
Nonconnected PACs must register by filing FEC Form 1 [PDF], Statement of Organization within 10 days after raising or spending in excess of $1,000 in connection with federal elections. Such PACs should download the Campaign Guide for Nonconnected Committees [PDF] for more information on the laws that apply to them.
toolkit Download our Nonconnected PAC Registration Toolkit
The complete package of forms and other information necessary to register a committee with the FEC.
http://www.fec.gov/ans/answers_pac.shtml#nonconnected
http://www.fec.gov/info/toolkit.shtml#nonconnected
http://www.fec.gov/pdf/nongui.pdf
When do I need to report my PAC’s receipts and disbursements?
After registering with the FEC, PACs must file regular reports disclosing their receipts and disbursements. PACs have the option to file these reports quarterly or monthly, and may change their filing frequency as often as once a year. PACs that choose to file quarterly may be required to file certain pre- and post-election reports, depending on their activity. Please consult our reporting page for more information.
Name some names.
It’s a word.
It is what I have been not able to communicate as my views as well.
Wonderful job.
We all have choices who we have in our lives.
Like smokers they are free to smoke but not in or on our property.
My son just cannot tolerate the smell and even chooses not to go often to the Indian Casinos as it makes him ill.
And likewise if my sons’ severe disability is offensive to any business we want to go to we simply don't if not welcomed.
Fortunately that has not happened to many times.
Either he wasn’t teachable or didn’t listen but ‘Doing the right thing’ taught by his dad obviously didn’t include standing by his word. That would be a conservative trait.
He can call people names but no one else should - liberalism!!
It’s a good time to clean them out since they outed themselves, IMO. Isn’t it nice to see when homosexuality is the topic, the ‘rats run to the cheese wearing a christian cape as a disguise.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.