Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Yes. HE had to wipe his chin after his last article.
1 posted on 12/17/2010 10:42:44 AM PST by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
To: pissant

I was wondering that as well.


2 posted on 12/17/2010 10:44:30 AM PST by FrdmLvr (Death to tyrants)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

I think Charles has the hots for Sarah Palin, and that’s why he crap-talks her all the time.


3 posted on 12/17/2010 10:44:39 AM PST by bigbob (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

No he is a liberal and always has been. The guy was a speech writer for Carter and Mondale what else needs to be said?


4 posted on 12/17/2010 10:45:35 AM PST by RINOS ARE RADICALS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

His aim is getting sloppy.

He hasn’t nailed anything in a while.

He sounds like just another establishment GOP sellout hack.


6 posted on 12/17/2010 10:46:54 AM PST by Califreak (November 2008 proved that Idiocracy isn't just a movie anymore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

Liberals are frightened to the bone, and now they have nothing left but to gather around Obamao. What a disappointment that is going to be for them. If watching liberals fail wasn’t so enjoyable, I would feel sorry for them. Poor Charles.


8 posted on 12/17/2010 10:49:43 AM PST by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

I think his top priority is personal and related to increasing stem cell research.


10 posted on 12/17/2010 10:53:44 AM PST by chopperman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

“...In 1978, Krauthammer quit medical practice to direct planning in psychiatric research for the Jimmy Carter administration, and began contributing to The New Republic magazine. During the presidential campaign of 1980, Krauthammer served as a speech writer to Vice President Walter Mondale....”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Krauthammer


11 posted on 12/17/2010 10:54:58 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet ("You don't have a soul. You are a Soul. You have a body." CS Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

Krauthammer is ruling class through and through. Always has been, always will be.


12 posted on 12/17/2010 10:56:07 AM PST by The4thHorseman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

Or it may be that Charles looked at the numbers, and decided all Obama had to do to be a comeback kid was keep unemployment below 30%.

Right track / wrong track poll has something like 23% right track. With those numbers one would expect a job approval no higher than 35%. Obama is around 48% job approval.

Many Americans WANT to like Obama. If Obama just keeps his trap shut, his re-election chances are good.

Disclaimer: I despise Obama, and can’t see a single good thing about the man. I’m just trying to be as objective as I can be based on polls and people I talk to.


13 posted on 12/17/2010 10:56:10 AM PST by brownsfan (D - swift death of the republic, R - lingering death for the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant; onyx
Hah-vahd educated MD Krauthammer can't get beyond Sarah's lack of Beltway pedigree. And until she kisses his ring and asks for his blessings, she is not worthy.

Much like some FReepers who take issue with hot, middle-aged, Conservative women that are more popular than their own obscure political heroes. ;^)

14 posted on 12/17/2010 10:56:32 AM PST by DTogo (High time to bring back the Sons of Liberty !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

“O” has done WAY too many things wrong that MATTER to recover anytime soon!


15 posted on 12/17/2010 10:57:15 AM PST by SMARTY (Conforming to non-conformity is conforming just the same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

not like that image from the other headline about Obama being in bed with Julian Assange wasn’t disturbing enough...


16 posted on 12/17/2010 10:58:29 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant
You can take the man out of the Beltway, but you can't take the Beltway out of the man.

This “Compromise” had been talked about for weeks before being implemented. Obama was just along for the ride. Giving credit to Obama is the way the Inside The Beltway crowd is framing the discussion.

17 posted on 12/17/2010 11:03:49 AM PST by Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

It always surprises me when Dr. K is referred to as a “conservative.” Obviously, he isn’t.

That said, he often has interesting insights. As long as nobody seriously believes he is a conservative, I’m interested at least listening to his point of view.


21 posted on 12/17/2010 11:15:23 AM PST by jazminerose (o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

It’s been there all along, not newly ‘developed’. That’s exactly why he denigrates Sarah Palin...he knows she truly could wipe Obama out.


25 posted on 12/17/2010 11:27:40 AM PST by Freddd (CNN is down to Three Hundred Thousand viewers. But they worked for it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

You’re probably right, but that’s not saying Krauthammer’s wrong here.

The bill had a subsidy for ethanol attached if I recall. I hate to say it, but if even Al Gore thinks ethanol is a bad idea, how did R’s let it pass?

Krauthammer’s warning the right that we need to find our balls, or Obama will hand them to us. I remember another recent president people underestimated, and we just passed the tax cuts he proposed yesterday.


26 posted on 12/17/2010 11:31:55 AM PST by RinaseaofDs (Does beheading qualify as 'breaking my back', in the Jeffersonian sense of the expression?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

He’s normally pretty good. I’ll chalk this up to a temporary loss of his senses.


27 posted on 12/17/2010 11:33:05 AM PST by Opinionated Blowhard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant
Yes. HE had to wipe his chin after his last article.

No, Krauthammer is correct. In making that deal, Obama has once again become "relevant." So it's a comeback for him.

For the moment he really has put himself back into the center of the political game, on an issue of real substance.

For a while, anyway: his intrinsic failings (e.g., the "hostage takers" comment and that shocking laziness about his presidential duties) are already coming back to bite him.

28 posted on 12/17/2010 11:37:25 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

Krauthammer’s subconscious:

“I have much more favorable feelings about an individual who- by his own admittance- received mediocre grades in high school but was able to get into Occidental College and then transfer to even finer schools because of the color of his skin, than I do about an individual who did not have that valuable advantage. I will accept as an article of faith that the individual whom I prefer truly was an academic stalwart, and I will not ask for further evidence clarifying that presumption, as it would shatter everything I have come to believe...

...My immediate, emotional knee-jerk reactions outweigh my, at times, uncomfortable pervasive awareness that the individual whom I favor would likely be determined to have the narcissistic personality disorder, or even worse, ASPD, if I were examining him as a psychiatrist. Further, my feelings outweigh my knowledge that the individual whom I prefer labeled “Iran a tiny country” not to be feared, whereas the other individual whom I innately fear has done everything but cartwheels to demonstrate her beliefs on the issue. When it comes down to it, I have a psychological need for the unresolved struggle, and that need is greater than my reasoned intelligent thoughts on the matter...

...I will value “book-smarts” (even though the individual who is supposedly book-smart never seems to quote anything interesting from books) over street-smarts at all costs. I will never understand that Reagan was a brilliant man- that he had a type of intelligence that is not measured in standardized tests (designed to confirm and preserve status quo definitions of intelligence)...

;-)


29 posted on 12/17/2010 11:40:38 AM PST by Qbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

That’s low.


31 posted on 12/17/2010 11:43:02 AM PST by Palladin (Stand and fight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson