The estate tax break, which will cost $68 billion in lost tax revenue, has little economic impact because it mostly affects the already affluent, who are less likely to spend their tax savings.
Why are they called “Bush tax cuts” and not the repeal of “Clinton tax increases?”
(See also repeal of “Clinton DADT.”
There are no tax cuts.
THERE ARE NO TAX CUTS!
Now really cut taxes!
Lower corporate taxes, lower ALL individual taxes, eliminate the capital gains tax, eliminate entirely the inheritance tax and lessen government regulations and restrictions.
Then stand back, further back or the American economic bull will trample you.
The only problem is this obvious solution, even though it works, does not empower the government.
Trollses there are on this thread, yess.
Not nearly as close as we were led to believe from the so-called outraged democrats.
Pussies. LOL!
Nothing funnier than Democrats pretending to care about spending or deficits.
Version of Donkey...I mean Mule Skinner Blues:) dedicated to the party of jackasses...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iXV9_WilcHs&feature=related
The Govt stinks at creating wealth. Cutting taxes on businesses will generate more revenue for the govt coffers. History is replete with examples. Most Dems and a few Reps will never understand this. The “rich,” not the govt, middle-class or the poor create wealth and jobs.
I love it how they call it a victory for Obumbles when he got practically NOTHING.