[tricksy]

Didn't we go through this same exact nonsense before, with some idiot claiming that GWB wasn't really Commander in Chief because "he stole the election"?

The more things change, the more they remain the same....

[edge919]

There’s a big difference. We have a Supreme Court definition of natural born citizen (one of the Art II requirements for office) and Obama doesn’t fit. It’s a simple, straightforward case.

[RipSawyer]

There was never any real evidence that G.W. Bush “stole” the election, there WAS evidence that the other party tried to steal it for Gore but failed to do so. There is plenty of evidence to indicate that Obama does not meet the constitutional test to be CIC. It is not the same nonsense at all.

[Recovering Ex-hippie]

You signed up in November 2010

to post this?

TROLL ALERT!

GET THE VIKING KITTIES!!

[little jeremiah]

Troll.

Difference is GWB wasn’t illegitimate, and 0bastard is.

[Cicero]

Well, but GWB didn’t steal the election. That was a liberal delusion. SCOTUS declared for Bush. The NY Times and others went down and actually counted the ballots, and they were unable to find any evidence that Gore won. And not for want of trying. They simply confirmed the Bush win—but of course did not publicize their findings.

Obama DID steal the presidency, and refuses to show evidence that he was qualified to run.