Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BuckeyeTexan
Note, howevr, that Lakin plead not guilty to the charge of missing movement. Perhaps, he did so because his attorney intends to argue upon appeal that the Judge was wrong on the law and that the superior who issued the order didn’t have the authority to issue it and/or that Lakin didn’t have a duty to obey it. We’ll have to see why he plead not guilty on that one.

Based on the testimony that was given, it appears to me that the defense strategy on that charge was to argue that Lakin was not guilty because he hadn't been given an explicit order to be on that plane. That the process had been just informal enough that Lakin could justifiably say he hadn't consciously disobeyed a direct order.

That defense strategy ended up falling apart when the prosecution put on a witness who stated that she had given exactly that order to Lakin.

583 posted on 12/17/2010 12:22:50 PM PST by LorenC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 577 | View Replies ]


To: LorenC

Well, there you go. I knew not about that which I was blathering. :)


586 posted on 12/17/2010 12:26:59 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 583 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson