Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: edge919; Lurking Libertarian
"He was not allowed to challenge the lawfulness of his orders, so there are different issues he could file suit over."

The lawfulness of a military order is a matter of law for the MJ to decide. Lakin made his case. It was predictably uncompelling and was rejected during pre-trial motions, and the rejection was well founded in military law.

He's not going to "file suit" over anything. He will have an automatic appeal to ACCA. That chances of him prevailing on appeal are the same as his chances of prevailing at GCM - precisely 0.00%. The chances of CAAF granting review on this case is slightly better - 0.001%. Once they refuse to grant review, it's over. That's it. Of course, Lakin isn't going to be confined for nearly the requisite time for a habeas petition.

202 posted on 12/16/2010 3:20:09 PM PST by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]


To: OldDeckHand
The lawfulness of a military order is a matter of law for the MJ to decide.

It can also be an essential element that can be presented for a jury to decide. Either way, an accused is still supposed to be able to challenge lawfulness in the trial.

206 posted on 12/16/2010 3:25:01 PM PST by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson