Your words not mine. I simply found a variety of errors in logic and rationale. For example, she suggested that Congress is the only governmental body that can vet presidential eligiblity, yet there is no Constitutional provision that makes this declaration. The existence of state laws that allow citizens to challenge candidates on the basis of eligibility goes further in disproving her ill-stated belief.
If that's the reversible error that you wish to hang your hat on, good luck with it. Although, you might want to keep the day job, just in case.