To: Jim Robinson
“A thorough survey of pertinent constitutional case law has yielded no reported decisions from any federal appellate courts extending the Commerce Clause or General Welfare Clause to encompass regulation of a person’s decision not to purchase a product People who do not purchase a home with a mortgage pay more income taxes than those who don't. The judge's thorough survey wasn't very thorough.
“This Court is . . . unpersuaded that [the individual mandate] is a bona fide revenue-raising measure
Unpersuaded? Bona fide? Give that man a crown!
97 posted on
12/13/2010 9:56:34 PM PST by
Mojave
(Ignorant and stoned - Obama's natural constituency.)
To: Mojave
No crown, but I’d give him a cigar. He got it right, It’s not a tax and it is an unconstitutional mandate.
101 posted on
12/13/2010 10:05:01 PM PST by
Jim Robinson
(Rebellion is brewing!! Nuke the corrupt commie bastards to HELL!!)
To: Mojave
People who do not purchase a home with a mortgage pay more income taxes than those who don't. The judge's thorough survey wasn't very thorough. Are you arguing that failing to qualify for a tax deduction is equal to a tax penalty? LOL
102 posted on
12/13/2010 10:07:34 PM PST by
Chunga
(Go, Sarah, GO!! - Jim Robinson)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson