To: Jim Robinson
A thorough survey of pertinent constitutional case law has yielded no reported decisions from any federal appellate courts extending the Commerce Clause or General Welfare Clause to encompass regulation of a persons decision not to purchase a product People who do not purchase a home with a mortgage pay more income taxes than those who don't. The judge's thorough survey wasn't very thorough.
This Court is . . . unpersuaded that [the individual mandate] is a bona fide revenue-raising measure
Unpersuaded? Bona fide? Give that man a crown!
97 posted on
12/13/2010 9:56:34 PM PST by
Mojave
(Ignorant and stoned - Obama's natural constituency.)
To: Mojave
No crown, but I’d give him a cigar. He got it right, It’s not a tax and it is an unconstitutional mandate.
101 posted on
12/13/2010 10:05:01 PM PST by
Jim Robinson
(Rebellion is brewing!! Nuke the corrupt commie bastards to HELL!!)
To: Mojave
People who do not purchase a home with a mortgage pay more income taxes than those who don't. The judge's thorough survey wasn't very thorough. Are you arguing that failing to qualify for a tax deduction is equal to a tax penalty? LOL
102 posted on
12/13/2010 10:07:34 PM PST by
Chunga
(Go, Sarah, GO!! - Jim Robinson)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson