Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dusttoyou
Obviously state laws were the source of restrictions on slaves, besides the practice being recognized in the Constitution.

The first couple of paragraphs of the Constitution refer, in fact, to "free persons" and "all others" ~ and if you don't understand what that meant you really have no business issuing pronunciamentos on what is or is not relevant to the Bill of Rights.

Yes, Constitutionally slavery was a recognized institution, and legally enforceable, and therefore dependent on the powers granted to the government by the Constitution ~ which was voted into power by the people eligible to vote ~ none of whom was a slave.

I'm actually astounded that there might still be some folks around who are ignorant of the legal basis for slavery in America. Like, did you imagine it was just something that drifted in, and then drifted out, and had nothing whatsoever to do with our laws, customs and Constitution?

196 posted on 12/13/2010 5:15:17 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies ]


To: muawiyah

pronunciamentos. ah Si, muy bein..... LOL
Adios


198 posted on 12/13/2010 5:23:45 AM PST by dusttoyou ("Progressives" are wee-weeing all over themselves, Foc nobama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson