Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dusttoyou
You were aware, of course, that black slaves were NOT allowed to just stop by a gunsmith's shop and pick up a firearm.

Later on in Dred Scott the Court confirmed the common belief ~ to wit: slaves had no rights.

That is a RESTRICTION ON RIGHTS

172 posted on 12/12/2010 6:33:09 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies ]


To: muawiyah

So what class of citizens does that still apply to?


173 posted on 12/12/2010 6:36:15 PM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies ]

To: muawiyah

Is it just weekends or winter and nothing better to do, is FR getting kookier?

There were and are many restrictions on many people that are voilating the Constitution. Even though some Rights are generally not violated by government to one degree or another, as a citizen there is also a responsibility for one to stand up for their own Constutional rights.

These little “stories” about “slaves no gun rights or slaves not allowed to stop by a gunsmith” has nothing to do with their rights being Constitutionally denied. Maybe there was some “law” implied or enforced toward such, but that is a far cry from being Constitutional or unConstitutional.

It really assists in a worthwhile discussion to insure you are well informed otherwise it becomes for your own purposes only.


193 posted on 12/13/2010 4:12:27 AM PST by dusttoyou ("Progressives" are wee-weeing all over themselves, Foc nobama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson