Oh, so now it doesn't matter that Jane's retracted it. A few posts back it mattered, but now it doesn't. Same thing happened with the LAX webcam pic. You threw everything you had at it to discredit it, but when you failed to do so, you declared that it didn't matter. Same with a hundred other positions you've taken. When you get beat, you either change the subject, go silent on that point, or declare that it doesn't matter. I guess it's a handy approach since it makes your argument impervious to counterargument in your own mind, but if your aim is to convince anybody of anything, it ain't working.
You're like a football team in the playoffs who gets to unilaterally declare which games will result in disqualification after you've played in them. Each time you lose you just say that game didn't count. At this point you're like 0 and 100, yet you think you still deserve to be taken seriously as a contender. Which is of course laughable.
So did the DoD. So has the MSM. So have most of the people here who now say “contrail.” So what?
But doesn't this prove that they didn't have a conspiratorial agenda? If their intent was to convince the public that it was just a jet contrail, why would they have initially said it was a rocket? Either it's an incredibly convoluted conspiracy or it's a simple case of them changing their conclusion once they had seen more of the evidence. Occam's razor and common sense say it was the latter.
By your logic (or at least the logic you're using at this particular moment), the earth doesn't really revolve around the sun since some experts initially said it was the other way around.
That's a lie.
But doesn't this prove that they didn't have a conspiratorial agenda? If their intent was to convince the public that it was just a jet contrail, why would they have initially said it was a rocket? Either it's an incredibly convoluted conspiracy...
I have never once accused anyone of a conspiracy so that's a lie too.