You likely could have made your point without disparaging the other fellow, who was making valid points. Accusing someone of embracing dogma over logic is rarely considered to be humor, and almost never complimentary. But that is my opinion.
This is a global scam with trillions of dollars, damaged economies, lost jobs and the very sovereignty of our country at stake (here in the USA, at least. The European Union has made sovereignty less of an issue for many Europeans, as I see it.)
This is a subject for which logic has been marginal for some time now, and that is entirely the fault of the supporters of AGW, as they have vilified anyone who even suggests their theory is seriously and fatally flawed. I agree with the other poster who suggested the purpose of this article is to support the notion that the "Global Warmists" have been right on the money all along. I don't think that is tin-foil theory either.