Apparently you just want to spew dogma rather than engage in a dialogeu - but that is your right.
I frankly don’t buy the conspiracy theories and don’t appreciate the resident wackos who prefer this course than actually considering the real scientific possiblity and potetnial consequences. Of course your screen name indicates this position so no suprise there.
I did read somewhere that “THEY” are trying to make a device to control your brainwaves so perhaps you should get a tin foil hat.
“I did read somewhere that “THEY” are trying to make a device to control your brainwaves so perhaps you should get a tin foil hat.”
Now that is some real intelligent argument, funny you cannot address the persons point that the so-called science has lost it’s credibility. But, you sure do come strong on attacking the person personally...
As far as I am concerned, there is not a shred of "science" regarding climate I am inclined to trust until it is disassociated from politics, and by that I mean the funding. The politics that drive climate research are all slanted one way. One single way, and no other. It is a giant teat the scientific community has been sucking off of, and their rigor in defending their "science" when it has been used inappropriately, out of context, or just plain lied about, has been far less than satisfactory to me.
There have been far too many (though not all) scientists who have said nothing about the way their research has been used, so as not to put their funding at risk. There has been big money in climate research.
But even more disturbing are the "scientists" who buy into global warming. The ones who are most vocal are those for whom earth sciences may not even be their primary discipline.
Global Warming is all political claptrap, especially (MOST ESPECIALLY) anthropogenic global warming.
No "conspiracy theory" can possibly do justice to the reality of the "green" movement. I got my PhD in chemisty in 1973, and watched the greens destroy the American nuclear power industry, and attempt to destroy pretty much every other industry that didn't "fit" their socialist agenda. "Climate science" is just another attempt to do the same thing. And they themselves say precisely that.
As to "global warming"....ALL the models are garbage. I suggest you read Dr. Roy Spencer's new book "The Great Global Warming Blunder-How Mother Nature Fooled The World's Top Climate Scientists" (actually how the "top climate scientists" fooled themselves and their "true believers") to understand how and why. His published peer reviewed study has been completely ignored by the "climate science industry" and the major news media, despite pointing out a gigantic fundamental flaw in the modeling efforts.
I just think it’s terribly immoral to lie about the climate in order to perpetrate socialism on the entire world.
After all, the true end of socialism is not “utopia” but theft of power by a very few. (It will always result in the most brutal among them killing off those who helped them seize power.)