Replies

Logic how a candidate who outspent her opponent 2:1 and lost by 16% is ACTUALLY a highly electable candidate and should be a leader?

Logic like how a paid punching bag for Bill Mahr is ACTUALLY a highly credible spokesman and leader for conservatism?

This woman is a shameless self promoter who has no record of accomplishments worth boasting about in education (despite her mischaracterizations), entrepreneurship (other than shameless self-promotion), or elsewhere.

Hitch your wagon to that horse if you want to, but she ain't leading ME anywhere. Those that most want to make C.O'D. out to be a leader seem to be those on the left, who just cannot get enough of her. But no problem for them, she will go on any and all shows, no matter how bad it makes conservatism look, as long as they pay her.

Logic how a candidate who outspent her opponent 2:1 and lost by 16% is ACTUALLY a highly electable candidate and should be a leader?

16% is not a lot, because a swing of 8% would erase that.

Delaware has 110,000 more registered Democrats than Republicans, genius. The Democrat Party increased voter registration by 11% of its total base from 2008 to 2010 -- BEFORE the GOP primary. Mike Castle was expected to be the nominee.

Christine O'Donnell has run in the toughest races in the toughest places. Other candidates are wimps.

She lost because the GOP was divided and attacked its own candidate.

Watch the video and see for yourself. Did you watch her analysis of the race in the video? Or did you just spout off nonsense without knowing what you are talking about?