To: RetroSexual
Ok for art class or a human sexuality class I suppose but hard to explain in an accounting class. Or was it a novel way to demonstrate when assets are far smaller than liabilities???
5 posted on
12/08/2010 9:27:28 AM PST by
NonValueAdded
(Palin 2012: don't retreat, just reload)
To: NonValueAdded
Ok for art class or a human sexuality class I suppose but hard to explain in an accounting class. Or was it a novel way to demonstrate when assets are far smaller than liabilities??? Maybe he had to count to twenty-one?
6 posted on
12/08/2010 9:29:47 AM PST by
Alex Murphy
("Posting news feeds, making eyes bleed, he's hated on seven continents")
To: NonValueAdded
Maybe he as demonstrating asset shrinkage. It’s been a cold winter. (I know the picture you’re thinking of.)
10 posted on
12/08/2010 9:31:26 AM PST by
Lonesome in Massachussets
(Socialists are to economics what circle squarers are to math; undaunted by reason or derision.)
To: NonValueAdded; All
Or perhaps demonstrating what you’ll have after an IRS audit???
To: NonValueAdded
ROTFL, assets smaller than liabilities
To: NonValueAdded
Or was it a novel way to demonstrate when assets are far smaller than liabilities??? He was lecturing on making a financial worth estimate when your assets have suffered depreciation.
47 posted on
12/08/2010 11:39:01 AM PST by
a fool in paradise
(The establishment clause isn't just against my OWN government establishing state religion in America)
To: NonValueAdded
70 posted on
12/08/2010 5:01:29 PM PST by
pointsal
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson