Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats' attacks on the rich bite them back...hard
Libradex ^ | PTD

Posted on 12/07/2010 11:07:08 PM PST by ssugasl231

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

1 posted on 12/07/2010 11:07:12 PM PST by ssugasl231
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ssugasl231

PARTY OF


2 posted on 12/07/2010 11:10:43 PM PST by FrankR (Don't let the bastards wear you down!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FrankR

I like it. If Democrats complain we can just tell them to “talk to the hand”.


3 posted on 12/07/2010 11:12:17 PM PST by ssugasl231
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ssugasl231

Finalist: SO-FROM-WHAT-YOU’RE-SAYING award.


4 posted on 12/07/2010 11:13:14 PM PST by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dr_lew

The article goes on to talk about how the emotional froth Democrats have whipped people in about tax cuts for the rich has now bit them given Obama has just extended them.


5 posted on 12/07/2010 11:18:23 PM PST by ssugasl231
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ssugasl231

Yes, he makes a good point.


6 posted on 12/07/2010 11:20:33 PM PST by cvq3842 (I don't waste my vote on third party candidates, like RINO Republicans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ssugasl231
Their class warfare hysteria, so carefully cultivated to use the basest of emotions, has now bit themselves. And bit themselves hard.

Questionable use of reflexive.

7 posted on 12/07/2010 11:37:42 PM PST by Minn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ssugasl231

Yesterday, O argued that not extending the tax cuts would cost the average American family $3000. That pretty much killed the old “tax cuts for the rich” mantra.


8 posted on 12/07/2010 11:39:01 PM PST by ArmstedFragg (hoaxy dopey changey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ssugasl231
As we stated here, tax cuts for the rich are only 3% of the deficit this year.
I love it when Democrat talking points are put in context . . .

9 posted on 12/07/2010 11:41:06 PM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (DRAFT PALIN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion

It’s so mindless of Democrats to talk about the “huge deficit caused by the Bush tax cuts for the rich”.

Tax cuts for the rich: $40 billion

Deficit this year: $1200 billion.

Yet even when faced with those numbers, Democrats will still blame tax cuts on the rich.

Only hope is independents.


10 posted on 12/07/2010 11:48:08 PM PST by ssugasl231
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ArmstedFragg

The real distortion was the Democrat claim that all the Bush tax cuts were tax cuts for the rich. That was the big lie that alll the class warfare was built around, and that collapsed when he proposed to extend all the tax cuts on the non-rich. The whole kurfuffle in the last few weeks was an attempt to keep the public from realizing that they’d been lied to about the nature of the tax cuts all these years.


11 posted on 12/07/2010 11:50:52 PM PST by ArmstedFragg (hoaxy dopey changey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion
Obama started off a few months ago saying the Bush Tax Cuts for the Rich cost $70 Billion.

He then changed that to $700 Billion over ten years.

Now we have every Democrat and their Media cronies saying $700 Billion, period. This of course gives the impression that those evil Bush Tax Cuts “cost” $700 Billion a year.

Senator “Tubs” McCaskill was out there yesterday comparing the $700 Billion gift the Republicans were giving the Evil Rich against the measly $58 Billion (?) that extending Unemployment for a year would cost.

Which sounds worse, $700 Billion for the Bad People versus $58 Billion for the Poor Little People OR $70 Billion for the Bad People versus $58 Billion for the Poor Little People?

They control the language and the information while the Republicans stand back and let them get away with it.

One other thing, notice how the story about Google hiding money overseas that would have resulted in $50 Billion in additional Tax Revenue to the Treasury never really caught fire in the news? I did.

12 posted on 12/07/2010 11:58:05 PM PST by Kickass Conservative (If Sarah Palin was President, you would have a job by now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ssugasl231

It has nothing to do with the deficit. They just are seething to take people’s money away from them. As Obama said during the debates, “People just shouldn’t have that much money”.

It’s all about envy and the desire to control others. Which makes the left both evil and petulant. They are a cancer in this country.


13 posted on 12/07/2010 11:58:51 PM PST by I still care (I miss my friends, bagels, and the NYC skyline - but not the taxes. I love the South.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I still care

“It’s all about envy and the desire to control others. Which makes the left both evil and petulant. They are a cancer in this country.”

Exactly right. This is the essence of the left.


14 posted on 12/08/2010 12:16:42 AM PST by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ssugasl231

>> Only hope is independents.

Hope for what?


15 posted on 12/08/2010 12:27:59 AM PST by Gene Eric (Your Hope has been redistributed. Here's your Change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: I still care

Which makes Obama’s capitulation (crossing fingers) all the more bitter for liberals.

That’s how this is going to bite them hard; this will linger well into 2012.


16 posted on 12/08/2010 12:49:16 AM PST by ssugasl231
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric

Hope to bring sanity back to government and never see leftists govern again.


17 posted on 12/08/2010 12:49:59 AM PST by ssugasl231
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ssugasl231

Oh, you meant “independence”, not “independents”.


18 posted on 12/08/2010 12:53:09 AM PST by Gene Eric (Your Hope has been redistributed. Here's your Change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric

No, I meant independents. Independent/swing voters are what brought leftists to power in the first place because liberals don’t have the votes.

Democrats can not be educated, but independents can.

Our only hope as a country is to try and reach independents so they don’t vote for Democrats ever again.


19 posted on 12/08/2010 12:56:41 AM PST by ssugasl231
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ssugasl231

>> No, I meant independents.

Oh, in that case, see post #15.


20 posted on 12/08/2010 12:58:39 AM PST by Gene Eric (Your Hope has been redistributed. Here's your Change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson