Posted on 12/07/2010 2:58:27 AM PST by bd476
And Soros is buying.
Can't forget that part.
It is not “Wiki leaks”.It’s “Rubber Leaks”!!!!
This is the most trumped up crap I have ever seen. He gets no bail for “sabotaging his condom”. You can’t make that up.
No its not down here.It has several mirror sites.http://www.newthinktank.com/2010/12/where-is-wikileaks/
How can we or these so-called “democratic” govts not compare themselves to a dictatorship such as the Iranian one, or most other govts in the ME, or any other dictatorship around the world, where the media exercises censorship, or is conveniently silent (or is silenced), in order to be politically correct, umm ... ‘politically sensitive’ ? Be it self regulation or shall we say self censorship ?
I understand there can be a fine line between ‘anarchy & democracy’. But, despite all the calls from “responsible” & prominent political & otherwise figures for Assange’s arrest & yes even ‘elimination’ (was it assassination ?), these ‘responsible’ world leaders still can not tell us what Assange did so illegally ? Except that his actions were ‘irresponsible’..
After all, Assange wasn’t the one who wrote the content of the communication pieces wikileaks has, so far, published - govt official & politicians did. Nor was he, to my knowledge, the one who disclosed the information in the first place. Did he not simply publish the info he was sent by others ?
We are constantly told that we live in a democratic society, where, obviously, one needs to toe the “official” BS approved by our ‘democratically [s]elected govts’.
For those who don’t know, the punishment for publishing any info that is not permitted by govts in the ME dictatorship such as Iran can result in the same action (reaction) as we’ve had from so-called Western, Democratic govts. A main difference, I can think of for now, is that the Iranian govt, for example, won’t let it linger on & won’t have a public debate about it ... they would nip it in the bud.
Assange is a low life who needs to meet an unhappy ending. But I must say an interpol warrant for not wearing a condom for a few one night stands with two bimbos who were giving it up to him because of his noteriety is stretching it. I prefer the Russian way of doing things in making him orange.
There’s slang for masturbation in spanish that goes like “jalársela”, meaning “to stretch it”, commonly used to answer to outrageous claims. I’m saying no more, but I find it oddly, weirdly and improperly appropiated.
“I think he has done us all a service inadvertently perhaps.”
I can see that. I can see, too, that he’s an irresponsible moron that’s probably responsible for some deaths that won’t be documented enough to end up in wikileaks someday. That should account for the venom and vitriol. Outside of that, right, he’s a somewhat likeable moron.
This guy is going to wind up with a bullet in the back of his head, then the media can sit around and debate which country’s security service took him out.
there is a part of me that is with ya’ll:
it pisses me off that the media cared not one whit when he exposed Bush torture and our paid informers-pols-agents in Iraq and Afghanistan but when he exposed Obama and Hillary then they get in a dander
and...what in the hell is a rape being charged for not wearing a condom?
good lord...is that the product of Nazi feminism in Scandinavia now
It is good that this guy is now under wraps. However, I am not certain that he has committed a crime. Certainly not rape, if the stories are true.
PFC Manning should be brought in front of a firing squad. “pour encourage les autres,” or “for encouragement of the others.”
For my part of the perspective on this matter, it isn’t about specific politicians, prominent figures, nor the ideological divide of the so-called 2 party (preferred) political system.
Left or right of the ideological/political divide, they can be ultimately viewed as the same, often with minor differences or how these ‘differences’ are presented to the public. Maybe one is more articulate than the other ... more media/PR savvy, ETC...
Nor it seems about ‘wearing a condom’ - though, apparently, the Pope allowed wearing the condom, reportedly, in recent mainstream media, and in certain cases ...
As for Feminists, particularly, most Westerbn feminist organisations, it has been a lost cause for decades vis a vis the enduring plight of the women in the ME. There have been & are so many anamolies, I wouldn’t know where to begin ... Even in the ME, there are & can be vast differences. For example, one can hardly compare the perspective, culture, traditions, and actions of many Iranian women to those of their counterparts in Arab countries. There are very distinct differences ... (another subject/topic).
Maybe it is about the hypocricy of it all - pointing the finger at someone they call a ‘low life’. And, that politicians, at the very least & often can Not be any better. In fact, politicians (formal & informal) are often much worse than the so-called ‘low life’.
I should think most people would object or be pissed off if their email account, for example, was accessed publicly.
But, in this case, it isn’t about ‘personal stuff’. It, to me, appears to be about what we are told as ordinary citizens Vs. what actually takes place & we are fed by official govts & the mainstream media.
Obviously, there is a fine line between what is considered anarchy vs. democratic rights to access info that is our right to Know.
Assange and/or wikileaks is certainly controversial. And, in a way, perhaps an equalizer in this case & for the last abovementioned paragraph.
“He VOLUNTARILY went to a police station? WHY?”
By British law, when a warrant for arrest is issued, he must surrender to the police 24 hours after informing them about his address.
If he didn’t, one more charge would be added.
“I no longer blindly defend “US interests”... It depends ENTIRELY on the agenda of those “interests” and WHO is implementing them.”
Well said and my thinking...exactly!!
He has the goods on Obama. That is his insurance and the reason Holder will not prosecute him.
Anyway, these two victims look like they were indulging in what Americans term Monday morning quarterbacking.
Jessica made contact with Sarah almost by coincidence, when she phoned a Labour Party office looking for Mr Assange - who had earlier promised to call her - only to discover she was not the only woman he had slept with that weekend, The Times reported. She then confided to the woman she barely knew that she had had unprotected sex and was worried about the possibility of sexually transmitted diseases, the newspaper reported.
This is why a woman ought to not have sex with some man she only just met. She might regret it afterwards. The cad might not even give her a call later. And he might have another lady on the side.
Mind you, Assange was an imbecile as well. He should have kept his zipper up. A person in his position needs to be discreet and aloof, not rolling in the hay with Swedish feminists.
Much as I salute our faithful allies the British for Mr. Wikileaks arrest that hopefully will result in his long time removal from society, I ask - “What about The Man Behind The Man?”
I find it hard to believe a lowly PFC (E3) Manning had access to so many classified documents. When I was in Air Force Intelligence we were restricted to material needed to perform our mission. This was called, “A need to know.”
Also, we were highly “compartmented.” For example, when I worked at the National Security Agency (NSA) in the late 1970s, not only didn’t I know what the people in the next office down the hall were doing; I didn’t know what project the Army guys in the same office were working on!
Therefore, I think the leaker of the documents was much higher up the chain of command. PFC Manning may have downloaded the documents, but I’ll give you good odds that the information came by way of the White House.
Cablegate is just one small part of Obama’s “Operation Chaos” designed to collapse the Republic in order to impose a communist dictatorship.
Hammer, meet Nail.
We've endured countless threadbare references to the real, and supposed evils of "the military/industrial complex," but my experience is that "the government/media complex" is FAR more pervasive, and nefarious.
So, THANK YOU for exposing the real core of this.
I want to rephrase your observation as a question, and engage the central hypothetical that now fairly screams for our attention:
In a Representative Republic where government is SUPPOSED TO BE "of the people, by the people, and for the people," and leaving aside the question of whether it actually is or isn't, IS THERE ANY information about the activities of said government that should NOT be made public; whether in real time, or very shortly following said activity? Is there even a legitimate need for a State with a citizen government to have any "State secrets"?
IOW is it, in fact, the case that there is a legitimate need for our form of government to keep to itself information about its activities? If the contention is that such a need does exist, then exactly what kinds of activities are SO delicate that the voters cannot be permitted to know about them?
That's giving BO too much credit. Assange is an opportunist to the extreme.
The story of Julian’s broken condem gives a whole new meaning to the term “Wikileaks”! LOL.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.