[FS11]

All that is needed for a Grand Jury Investigation to indict BO and his WikiLeaks co-conspirators are "tips, rumor or the personal knowledge of the grand jurors." Justice Lewis Powell ruled:“ Such an (Grand Jury) investigation may be triggered by tips, rumors… or the personal knowledge of the grand jurors.” http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2010/07/taking-aka-obama-directly-before-scotus.html

[BuckeyeTexan]

You don’t seem to understand the difference between “investigate” and “indict.”

Yes, a grand jury can investigate based on tips, rumors, or personal knowledge, but there must be convincing evidence that a crime was committed before a grand jury will actually indict (i.e. charge or accuse) someone.

I see no evidence connecting Obamao to Wikileaks in what you provided that would warrant a grand jury investigation, much less prompt an indictment.

[BuckeyeTexan]

You don’t seem to understand the difference between “investigate” and “indict.”

Yes, a grand jury can investigate based on tips, rumors, or personal knowledge, but there must be convincing evidence that a crime was committed before a grand jury will actually indict (i.e. charge or accuse) someone.

I see no evidence connecting Obamao to Wikileaks in what you provided that would warrant a grand jury investigation, much less prompt an indictment.