In plain fact, though, Reagan had served two terms as Governor of California to Palin's three years and out as Governor of Alaska. Reagan had also been a powerful force in shaping and defining American Conservative thought -- a more than worthy successor to Barry Goldwater in the political arena. In terms of gravitas, I have the feeling that Governor Palin is not quite there yet.
I am assuredly not anti-Palin. I voted for her in 2008 despite having a low regard for her running mate. If she is the nominee in 2012, I will almost surely vote for her again.
But in the meantime, we conservatives need to have an honest and civil discussion about whether she is the best we can do and whether she can beat Obama. That latter discussion necessarily includes her appeal, or lack thereof, to voters outside the conservative party base. That same discussion must be had about the other candidates as well. It just seems more difficult to have the discussion about Governor Palin since her staunch supporters are often very doctrinaire and very quick to demonize anyone who questions or criticizes her as a "Rino" or worse.
As I’ve pointed out on other threads:
To become president in 2013, the conservative candidate must raise $1,000,000,000 by the spring of 2012. It is that simple. It is on the critical path.
Who besides Sarah Palin has a chance to do this? Based on campaign financing rules it will require millions of hard working Americans to hit this number
If Palin is not the nominee the GOP will never get the money or help that they could have!
Also some will be so disappointed that they will stay home! This is a fact!
When was the last the Republicans didn't vote someone with her base as the nominee! never happened. REASON - SHE IS A WOMAN!