Replies

The Supreme Court Justices actions, or lack thereof have determined that they are dishonorable. The court could once again define the original intent of Natural Born.
CHILDREN OF CITIZENS SHALL BE CONSIDERED NATURAL BORN

But for political reasons, they are refusing to become involved.
It’s not neccesary for them to declare obama ineleigible, only publicly define Natural Born as being born to parents who were U.S. citizens. IT would then be up to Congress to remove obama.

The Supreme Court would only rule on the factual evidence of an appeal IF the appeal wasn’t dismissed at the original trial court level. Since EVERY Obama eligibility lawsuit that has reached the high court seeking a Writ of Certiorari was dismissed for lack of standing, the ONLY issue that the Supreme Court can address is did the trial court and the Circuit Court of Appeals err on the dismissal for lack of standing.

No Obama eligibility lawsuit has featured a plaintiff with standing to sue: someone who can show DIRECT injury from the election of Barack Obama as an illegal candidate.

At the appeals court level, the justices are required to accept as true, everything that the plaintiff is alleging and to cast the plaintiff’s case in the most favorable light and THEN decide if the original trial court erred in its application of the law.
It also doesn’t help the “Obama is ineligible movement” that no well known, major conservative constitutional attorney, someone of the stature of Judge Robert Bork or Ted Olsen has written any of the Petitions for a Writ of Certiorari.

You are still acting like the Supreme Court is an original jurisdiction court and not an appeals court. If any Obama eligibiity suit that was dismissed for standing reasons was ever heard by the Supreme Court and the Justices ruled in the plaintiff’s favor, that lawsuit would then return to the original trial court for a trial on the merits with the plaintiffs being granted standing. It would then have to work its way back through the appeals court process.

It is my personal opinion that unless John Sidney McCain, Sarah Palin and/or the Republican National Committee is the plaintiff or lead plaintiff in a class action suit, no other entity will ever be granted standing to sue.
That is why I favor a criminal justice approach where standing issues are not a factor. A grand jury investigation for election fraud can be convened in any jurisdiction where Barack Obama’s name was on the ballot. I suggest that happen in any of the reddest of the red states.
The current “reddest of the red” are Wyoming and Mississippi.