I didn't say that.
I meant children watching the Super Bowl with mom and dad should not be exposed to disturbing images. I think that's reasonable.
I would agree with you, but that’s really not the argument, is it?
So far, we are perfectly willing to expose our children to disturbing images, provided it’s got nothing to do with abortion.
Again, given the current broadcast standards, I see no reason why they shouldn’t show a graphic abortion spot in the superbowl.
When we can have Obama try to shove garbage down our throats, then graphic abortion shots are fair game. When our enemies stop trying to use the game as a political advertisement, then we can discuss things like ‘tactics’, as it is, we are crippling ourselves.