Posted on 11/30/2010 7:04:48 AM PST by RobinMasters
BO’s WikiLeaks have not only damaged HC but BO’s WikiLeaks have ruined any chance for a success in Afghanistan similar to President Bush’s success in Iraq.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/dec/03/clinton-apologises-uk-wikileaks
However, the cables are far from being a laughing matter for foreign diplomats in Kabul who fear that the portrayal of the president of Afghanistan, Hamid Karzai, and his government in a deeply unflattering light will lead to a further slump in US-Afghan relations.
Suspicions of tensions were fuelled yesterday when a promised face-to-face meeting between Barack Obama and his Afghan counterpart failed to materialise.
It was called off, US officials said, because of bad weather – making it difficult for helicopters to fly Obama to Kabul from Bagram airbase, where he met troops. A videoconference planned in its place was also dropped, officials said, because of the weather. The two spoke by phone.
Hillary Clinton also phoned the Afghan president to reassure him of US support, but it remains to be seen whether the relationship will be weakened.
US diplomats in Kabul are furious with WikiLeaks, and believe it may have done real damage to the vital relationship.
More and more this looks like Hillary was the main target here.
3 posted on Tuesday, November 30, 2010 9:07:49 AM by GQuagmire
BO’s WikiLeaks served two purposes for BO.
1. Damage to HC to try and stop her from running against him in 2008.
2. Destruction of America.
However, Obama can’t just fire Hillary, since she is the keeper of the Passports and Visas ......
P.S. Isn’t it amazing that hundreds of thousands of classified documents and videos have been posted on the web, but not one of Obama’s personal documents (B.C., transcripts, passports, visas ) has shown up !
32 posted on Tuesday, November 30, 2010 9:24:23 AM by SecondAmendment
The fact is minors can and do move out of the country with their parents and renounce their US citizenship, especially in third world countries who do not participate in the Hague Convention standards.
Regardless of Barry’s mothers aspirations, Barry Soetoro was assigned a locally employed staff member at the Jakarta Embassy to investigate and report on Barry’s request to renounce his US citizenship. A Certificate of Loss of Citizenship is issued by the US SoS at his or her discretion to any US citizen, even a 5 year old.
Barry came back to America, alone, when he was 10 years old as an Indonesian National. His grandmother was appointed his guardian after his mother’s parental rights were extinguished due to abandonment (See Barry came back to America alone).
Barry’s father, Barack Hussein Obama, returned to Hawaii to object to the Soetoro adoption and have it annulled. Barry’s name was legally changed back to Barack Hussein Obama, II.
An American Refugee Organization located in Connecticut handled BHO’s II legal paperwork on his behalf. Consequently, he was issued a Connecticut SSN because that is where it was mailed to. He applied for a SSN as a Legal Resident of the US and not a US Citizen.
Years later, BHO II applied to become a naturalized citizen on of the US. This can be verified with his Certificate of Naturalization on file with US Customs and Immigration Service. The paper trail is thick and undeniable.
The Dems will have to move on this or say Hello to President Boehner.
54 posted on Tuesday, November 30, 2010 3:38:48 PM by SvenMagnussen
Well, since I believe that was Obama who I met in 1980 who told me that he was BORN in Mombassa, raised in Indonesia, and lving in Hawaii with people who were nOT his parents, and the odds of there being TWO people on Oahu that day who could say that, I would say Sven’s theory sounds plausible for now.
Such a crying shame that there’s not a whit of evidence to support your claim. Just a thirty year old memory that you never put to pen until well after the rumors were circulating about BHO.
And Sven is still making crap up. You’ll notice that he cannot produced a hint of support for his claim either.
I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt. You may truly believe you met BHO in 1980. But Sven knows he’s lying.
YOU still need to provide me the SECOND person on Oahu that was born in mombassa, raised in Indonesia and lived on Oahu in August 1980 and was a mullatto male about 18 to 20
I KNOW I went back to the barracks to get other people to come with me and bring their photo albums to show the guy what his home country looked like, since I was just there 3 months before.
yeah, i guess I just made it all up...NOT!
Don’t be ridiculous.
You’ve made a fantastical claim. I say that I do not believe your claim. You say that I need prove that your memory of a brief event thirty years ago is incorrect.
That’s not how it works.
No, the way it works is YOU have to disprove my claim.
Feel free to pay for the polygraph, smart guy! Then fly me there.
And back! All meals and lodging, too.
As I mentioned, I give you the benefit of the doubt. You may very well believe it happened.
I just don't think it actually did happen.
You have an anecdote. You say something happened.
Fine.
But I do not believe it happened and I have no interest in trying to convince you of anything.
Trying to claim that people who do not believe you must prove you wrong is plainly stupid.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.